2008•Sites a journal of social anthropology and cultural studiesOpen access

THE ETHNOGRAPHICISATION OF ANGLO-AMERICAN ANTHROPOLOGY:CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES

James Urry

Open full text 5 citations

Abstract

Anthropology, at least in terms of its emphasis on social and cultural life, is noted both within and outside the discipline for the quality of its ethnography. Ethnography, however, has come to mean different things within and outside anthropology. One dominant understanding is associated with ethnography as a distinct methodology involved with qualitative, local level research. Another concerns the product of such research – ethnographic accounts of social and cultural groups including the form of such texts as literary objects. How ethnography developed in the British and American traditions reveals how the discipline became more focussed on methodology and text than on theory. The contexts of this shift and its consequences for anthropological practice are considered with a suggestion that perhaps anthropologists are really ethnographers, not anthropologists, and perhaps a broader view of anthropology needs to be rediscovered.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Anthropology, at least in terms of its emphasis on social and cultural life, is noted both within and outside the discipline for the quality of its ethnography. Ethnography, however, has come to mean different things within and outside anthropology. One dominant understanding is associated with ethnography as a distinct methodology involved with qualitative, local level research. Another concerns the product of such research – ethnographic accounts of social and cultural groups including the form of such texts as literary objects. How ethnography developed in the British and American traditions reveals how the discipline became more focussed on methodology and text than on theory. The contexts of this shift and its consequences for anthropological practice are considered with a suggestion that perhaps anthropologists are really ethnographers, not anthropologists, and perhaps a broader view of anthropology needs to be rediscovered.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Anthropology, at least in terms of its emphasis on social and cultural life, is noted both within and outside the discipline for the quality of its ethnography. Ethnography, however, has come to mean different things within and outside anthropology. One dominant understanding is associated with ethnography as a distinct methodology involved with qualitative, local level research. Another concerns the product of such research – ethnographic accounts of social and cultural groups including the form of such texts as literary objects. How ethnography developed in the British and American traditions reveals how the discipline became more focussed on methodology and text than on theory. The contexts of this shift and its consequences for anthropological practice are considered with a suggestion that perhaps anthropologists are really ethnographers, not anthropologists, and perhaps a broader view of anthropology needs to be rediscovered.

Key concepts: Ethnography, Anthropology, Sociology, Applied anthropology, Social anthropology, Cultural anthropology, Sociocultural anthropology, Digital anthropology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
THE ETHNOGRAPHICISATION OF ANGLO-AMERICAN ANTHROPOLOGY:CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES — Research Paper | ScholarLens