Experimental and numerical investigation of supersonic flow through a square duct
David O. Davis, F. B. Gessner, G. David Kerlick
Abstract
David O. Davis, F. B. Gessner, G. David Kerlick
Abstract
Steady, developing, adiabatic supersonic flow in a square duct is investigated for an inlet Mach number of 3.91 and a unit Reynolds number of 1.8 x 10 to the 6th/m. The numerical results for laminar flow show that two secondary flow cells develop in the near vicinity of the corner which are centered about the corner bisector and distort the primary flow in this region. For turbulent flow, the experimental results indicate that two secondary flow cells also develop about the corner bisector, but are directed in an opposite sense to that observed for the laminar case. Numerical results based on the Baldwin-Lomax model show that this model is incapable of predicting turbulence-generated secondary flow cells. For a suitable choice of constants, the Gessner-Emery model is able to predict the strength of these cells, but is deficient with respect to predicting their positions in the flow and their distorting influence on the primary flow. These observations are based on comparisons made in this paper between predicted and measured total pressure contours, cross flow velocity profiles, and local wall shear stress distributions.
OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Steady, developing, adiabatic supersonic flow in a square duct is investigated for an inlet Mach number of 3.91 and a unit Reynolds number of 1.8 x 10 to the 6th/m. The numerical results for laminar flow show that two secondary flow cells develop in the near vicinity of the corner which are centered about the corner bisector and distort the primary flow in this region. For turbulent flow, the experimental results indicate that two secondary flow cells also develop about the corner bisector, but are directed in an opposite sense to that observed for the laminar case. Numerical results based on the Baldwin-Lomax model show that this model is incapable of predicting turbulence-generated secondary flow cells. For a suitable choice of constants, the Gessner-Emery model is able to predict the strength of these cells, but is deficient with respect to predicting their positions in the flow and their distorting influence on the primary flow. These observations are based on comparisons made in this paper between predicted and measured total pressure contours, cross flow velocity profiles, and local wall shear stress distributions.
Key concepts: Choked flow, Square (algebra), Supersonic speed, Mechanics, Duct (anatomy), Flow (mathematics), Computer science, Physics