1985Unpublished venueRequires access

Experimental and numerical investigation of supersonic flow through a square duct

David O. Davis, F. B. Gessner, G. David Kerlick

Open publisher page 9 citations

Abstract

Steady, developing, adiabatic supersonic flow in a square duct is investigated for an inlet Mach number of 3.91 and a unit Reynolds number of 1.8 x 10 to the 6th/m. The numerical results for laminar flow show that two secondary flow cells develop in the near vicinity of the corner which are centered about the corner bisector and distort the primary flow in this region. For turbulent flow, the experimental results indicate that two secondary flow cells also develop about the corner bisector, but are directed in an opposite sense to that observed for the laminar case. Numerical results based on the Baldwin-Lomax model show that this model is incapable of predicting turbulence-generated secondary flow cells. For a suitable choice of constants, the Gessner-Emery model is able to predict the strength of these cells, but is deficient with respect to predicting their positions in the flow and their distorting influence on the primary flow. These observations are based on comparisons made in this paper between predicted and measured total pressure contours, cross flow velocity profiles, and local wall shear stress distributions.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Steady, developing, adiabatic supersonic flow in a square duct is investigated for an inlet Mach number of 3.91 and a unit Reynolds number of 1.8 x 10 to the 6th/m. The numerical results for laminar flow show that two secondary flow cells develop in the near vicinity of the corner which are centered about the corner bisector and distort the primary flow in this region. For turbulent flow, the experimental results indicate that two secondary flow cells also develop about the corner bisector, but are directed in an opposite sense to that observed for the laminar case. Numerical results based on the Baldwin-Lomax model show that this model is incapable of predicting turbulence-generated secondary flow cells. For a suitable choice of constants, the Gessner-Emery model is able to predict the strength of these cells, but is deficient with respect to predicting their positions in the flow and their distorting influence on the primary flow. These observations are based on comparisons made in this paper between predicted and measured total pressure contours, cross flow velocity profiles, and local wall shear stress distributions.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Steady, developing, adiabatic supersonic flow in a square duct is investigated for an inlet Mach number of 3.91 and a unit Reynolds number of 1.8 x 10 to the 6th/m. The numerical results for laminar flow show that two secondary flow cells develop in the near vicinity of the corner which are centered about the corner bisector and distort the primary flow in this region. For turbulent flow, the experimental results indicate that two secondary flow cells also develop about the corner bisector, but are directed in an opposite sense to that observed for the laminar case. Numerical results based on the Baldwin-Lomax model show that this model is incapable of predicting turbulence-generated secondary flow cells. For a suitable choice of constants, the Gessner-Emery model is able to predict the strength of these cells, but is deficient with respect to predicting their positions in the flow and their distorting influence on the primary flow. These observations are based on comparisons made in this paper between predicted and measured total pressure contours, cross flow velocity profiles, and local wall shear stress distributions.

Key concepts: Choked flow, Square (algebra), Supersonic speed, Mechanics, Duct (anatomy), Flow (mathematics), Computer science, Physics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Experimental and numerical investigation of supersonic flow through a square duct — Research Paper | ScholarLens