Electrohydrodynamic (EHD) Heat Transfer Enhancement in an Aviation Working Fluid: Effect of Electrode Material and Polarity
John S. Paschkewitz, David M. Pratt
Abstract
John S. Paschkewitz, David M. Pratt
Abstract
Electrohydrodynamic heat transfer enhancement in the aviation coolant PAO was examined using a concentric wire-cylinder test section. Stainless steel (alloy 304), brass (alloy 260), and bronze (alloy 510) wire electrodes were used with both negative and positive polarity. The outer tube was 316 stainless steel. Bronze gave enhancements over an order of magnitude greater than either brass or stainless steel, with smaller increases in pressure drop and lower electrical power requirements for both positive and negative polarities. Several explanations are given for the differences in performance are discussed.
OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Electrohydrodynamic heat transfer enhancement in the aviation coolant PAO was examined using a concentric wire-cylinder test section. Stainless steel (alloy 304), brass (alloy 260), and bronze (alloy 510) wire electrodes were used with both negative and positive polarity. The outer tube was 316 stainless steel. Bronze gave enhancements over an order of magnitude greater than either brass or stainless steel, with smaller increases in pressure drop and lower electrical power requirements for both positive and negative polarities. Several explanations are given for the differences in performance are discussed.
Key concepts: Electrohydrodynamics, Heat transfer enhancement, Materials science, Heat transfer, Mechanics, Working fluid, Electrode, Heat transfer coefficient