1965•Photochemistry and PhotobiologyRequires access

LIGHT REACTION SYSTEMS IN CYANOPHYCEAE*

Wilhelm Nultsch

Open publisher page 18 citations

Abstract

Abstract— In the blue green algae, Phormidium uncinatum and Ph. autumnale, movement in the dark is arrested by 2 × 10‐‐4 M DCPIP†, whereas photokinesis, i.e. the acceleration of the movement by light, is not markedly impaired. Thus at this concentration movement occurs in the light, but not in the dark. Obviously, the dark movement is coupled with oxidative phosphoiylation and the inhibitory effect of DCPLP is probably due to trapping of electrons from the cytochrome chain and uncoupling of the oxidative phosphorylation whereas photophosphorylation in vivo is not uncoupled and accordingly photokinesis is not inhibited. On the other hand, the dark movement is not influenced by 10‐‐4 M DCMU, a high concentration, which otherwise stops both cyclic and non‐cyclic photophosphorylation and hence photokinesis. The inhibition by DCMU of that part of the light induced movement which is due to non‐cyclic phosphorylation is reversible by the addition of ferrocyanide (10‐‐2 to 10‐‐4 M) as external electron donor. The photo‐phobotactic response is less sensitive to DCMU and is not completely suppressed even at 10‐‐3 M. The inhibition is not significantly reversible by the addition of ferrocyanide. However, 10‐‐4 M DCPIP, that does not considerably impair photokinesis, suppresses the photo‐phobotactic responx completely. Thus, contrary to Links' hypothesis, photo‐phobotaxis cannot be linked with photophosphorylation. But there is some evidence that photo‐phobotaxis is coupled with the non‐cyclic electron transport of photosynthesis at another point, which seems to lie between electron supply from oxygen and the inhibition point of DCMU, probably in the region of the acmssory pigments.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract— In the blue green algae, Phormidium uncinatum and Ph. autumnale, movement in the dark is arrested by 2 × 10‐‐4 M DCPIP†, whereas photokinesis, i.e. the acceleration of the movement by light, is not markedly impaired. Thus at this concentration movement occurs in the light, but not in the dark. Obviously, the dark movement is coupled with oxidative phosphoiylation and the inhibitory effect of DCPLP is probably due to trapping of electrons from the cytochrome chain and uncoupling of the oxidative phosphorylation whereas photophosphorylation in vivo is not uncoupled and accordingly photokinesis is not inhibited. On the other hand, the dark movement is not influenced by 10‐‐4 M DCMU, a high concentration, which otherwise stops both cyclic and non‐cyclic photophosphorylation and hence photokinesis. The inhibition by DCMU of that part of the light induced movement which is due to non‐cyclic phosphorylation is reversible by the addition of ferrocyanide (10‐‐2 to 10‐‐4 M) as external electron donor. The photo‐phobotactic response is less sensitive to DCMU and is not completely suppressed even at 10‐‐3 M. The inhibition is not significantly reversible by the addition of ferrocyanide. However, 10‐‐4 M DCPIP, that does not considerably impair photokinesis, suppresses the photo‐phobotactic responx completely. Thus, contrary to Links' hypothesis, photo‐phobotaxis cannot be linked with photophosphorylation. But there is some evidence that photo‐phobotaxis is coupled with the non‐cyclic electron transport of photosynthesis at another point, which seems to lie between electron supply from oxygen and the inhibition point of DCMU, probably in the region of the acmssory pigments.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 18 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract— In the blue green algae, Phormidium uncinatum and Ph. autumnale, movement in the dark is arrested by 2 × 10‐‐4 M DCPIP†, whereas photokinesis, i.e. the acceleration of the movement by light, is not markedly impaired. Thus at this concentration movement occurs in the light, but not in the dark. Obviously, the dark movement is coupled with oxidative phosphoiylation and the inhibitory effect of DCPLP is probably due to trapping of electrons from the cytochrome chain and uncoupling of the oxidative phosphorylation whereas photophosphorylation in vivo is not uncoupled and accordingly photokinesis is not inhibited. On the other hand, the dark movement is not influenced by 10‐‐4 M DCMU, a high concentration, which otherwise stops both cyclic and non‐cyclic photophosphorylation and hence photokinesis. The inhibition by DCMU of that part of the light induced movement which is due to non‐cyclic phosphorylation is reversible by the addition of ferrocyanide (10‐‐2 to 10‐‐4 M) as external electron donor. The photo‐phobotactic response is less sensitive to DCMU and is not completely suppressed even at 10‐‐3 M. The inhibition is not significantly reversible by the addition of ferrocyanide. However, 10‐‐4 M DCPIP, that does not considerably impair photokinesis, suppresses the photo‐phobotactic responx completely. Thus, contrary to Links' hypothesis, photo‐phobotaxis cannot be linked with photophosphorylation. But there is some evidence that photo‐phobotaxis is coupled with the non‐cyclic electron transport of photosynthesis at another point, which seems to lie between electron supply from oxygen and the inhibition point of DCMU, probably in the region of the acmssory pigments.

Key concepts: Photophosphorylation, DCMU, Electron transport chain, Oxidative phosphorylation, Chemistry, Biophysics, Photochemistry, Photosynthesis

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
LIGHT REACTION SYSTEMS IN CYANOPHYCEAE* — Research Paper | ScholarLens