1998The Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaRequires access

Learning changes in the recognition, repetition, and free recall of pseudowords

Dragana Barac-Cikoja, Lyn Goldberg, Kathy Siren, Christy L. Ludlow

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Acquisition of a pair of three-syllabic (11-phoneme) pseudowords associated with meaningless ideographs was examined across 15 trials on three tasks. For each word, an ideograph-prompted recall was succeeded by the identification of each constituent syllable among two foils, ending with two repetitions of the recorded pseudoword. The words were alternated throughout the experiment. Subjects verbal productions were phonetically transcribed and scored for segmental and syllabic accuracy. The scores were used to compare changes in performance on: (a) the recall and the repetition tasks, (b) the syllable recognition and the repetition tasks, and (c) between two repetitions. Phonological errors in the three tasks were highly related with intra-syllabic differentiation increasing with learning. [Work supported by NIH ZO1 DC 00005-09.]

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Acquisition of a pair of three-syllabic (11-phoneme) pseudowords associated with meaningless ideographs was examined across 15 trials on three tasks. For each word, an ideograph-prompted recall was succeeded by the identification of each constituent syllable among two foils, ending with two repetitions of the recorded pseudoword. The words were alternated throughout the experiment. Subjects verbal productions were phonetically transcribed and scored for segmental and syllabic accuracy. The scores were used to compare changes in performance on: (a) the recall and the repetition tasks, (b) the syllable recognition and the repetition tasks, and (c) between two repetitions. Phonological errors in the three tasks were highly related with intra-syllabic differentiation increasing with learning. [Work supported by NIH ZO1 DC 00005-09.]

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Acquisition of a pair of three-syllabic (11-phoneme) pseudowords associated with meaningless ideographs was examined across 15 trials on three tasks. For each word, an ideograph-prompted recall was succeeded by the identification of each constituent syllable among two foils, ending with two repetitions of the recorded pseudoword. The words were alternated throughout the experiment. Subjects verbal productions were phonetically transcribed and scored for segmental and syllabic accuracy. The scores were used to compare changes in performance on: (a) the recall and the repetition tasks, (b) the syllable recognition and the repetition tasks, and (c) between two repetitions. Phonological errors in the three tasks were highly related with intra-syllabic differentiation increasing with learning. [Work supported by NIH ZO1 DC 00005-09.]

Key concepts: Syllabic verse, Pseudoword, Repetition (rhetorical device), Syllable, Recall, Speech recognition, Word (group theory), Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Learning changes in the recognition, repetition, and free recall of pseudowords — Research Paper | ScholarLens