2008PlateletsRequires access

Current concepts about inhibition of platelet aggregation

Giovanni de Gaetano, Marilena Crescente, Chiara Cerletti

Open publisher page 10 citations

Abstract

One hundred twenty-seven years after Professor Giulio Bizzozero described the blood particle that has come to be known as the platelet, antiplatelet therapy has revolutionized the treatment of cardiovascular disease. Platelet function testing, introduced in 1962 with the advent of Born's aggregometer, heralded a renaissance in platelet research and provided a platelet function test to study platelet reactivity in vitro to help the diagnosis of bleeding disorders. More devices to test platelet function have emerged since, and these are now being applied mainly to assess antiplatelet drug efficacy in thrombotic disorders. Although this may be a logical use for platelet function tests, the data are replete with contradictions, and there is a lack of both consensus and standardization of the methodology. As a result, the clinical validity of platelet function results to monitor response to antiplatelet drugs has yet to be established.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

One hundred twenty-seven years after Professor Giulio Bizzozero described the blood particle that has come to be known as the platelet, antiplatelet therapy has revolutionized the treatment of cardiovascular disease. Platelet function testing, introduced in 1962 with the advent of Born's aggregometer, heralded a renaissance in platelet research and provided a platelet function test to study platelet reactivity in vitro to help the diagnosis of bleeding disorders. More devices to test platelet function have emerged since, and these are now being applied mainly to assess antiplatelet drug efficacy in thrombotic disorders. Although this may be a logical use for platelet function tests, the data are replete with contradictions, and there is a lack of both consensus and standardization of the methodology. As a result, the clinical validity of platelet function results to monitor response to antiplatelet drugs has yet to be established.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 10 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

One hundred twenty-seven years after Professor Giulio Bizzozero described the blood particle that has come to be known as the platelet, antiplatelet therapy has revolutionized the treatment of cardiovascular disease. Platelet function testing, introduced in 1962 with the advent of Born's aggregometer, heralded a renaissance in platelet research and provided a platelet function test to study platelet reactivity in vitro to help the diagnosis of bleeding disorders. More devices to test platelet function have emerged since, and these are now being applied mainly to assess antiplatelet drug efficacy in thrombotic disorders. Although this may be a logical use for platelet function tests, the data are replete with contradictions, and there is a lack of both consensus and standardization of the methodology. As a result, the clinical validity of platelet function results to monitor response to antiplatelet drugs has yet to be established.

Key concepts: Platelet, Medicine, Platelet disorder, Antiplatelet drug, Platelet aggregation, Pharmacology, Intensive care medicine, Clopidogrel

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Current concepts about inhibition of platelet aggregation — Research Paper | ScholarLens