1984RadiographicsRequires access

Arthrotomography of the shoulder

Charles S. Resnik, Andrew L. Deutsch, D Resnick, Jerrold H. Mink, Jack L. Berman, Robert O. Cone, Larry A. Danzig, José Guerra

Open publisher page 7 citations

Abstract

Computed and conventional arthrotomography are accurate methods of evaluating the glenohumeral joint. Structures that can normally be observed include the humeral head, the bony glenoid fossa, the fibrous glenoid labrum, and the biceps tendon. Abnormalities of the labrum and glenoid fossa are easily identified by both examinations, and osseous defects of the humeral head and alterations of the biceps are ideally depicted by computed anthrotomography. Although computed anthrotomography is easier to perform and better tolerated by patients, either method of arthrotomography can serve as an effective screening test for patients undergoing evaluation of glenohumeral joint instability.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Computed and conventional arthrotomography are accurate methods of evaluating the glenohumeral joint. Structures that can normally be observed include the humeral head, the bony glenoid fossa, the fibrous glenoid labrum, and the biceps tendon. Abnormalities of the labrum and glenoid fossa are easily identified by both examinations, and osseous defects of the humeral head and alterations of the biceps are ideally depicted by computed anthrotomography. Although computed anthrotomography is easier to perform and better tolerated by patients, either method of arthrotomography can serve as an effective screening test for patients undergoing evaluation of glenohumeral joint instability.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Computed and conventional arthrotomography are accurate methods of evaluating the glenohumeral joint. Structures that can normally be observed include the humeral head, the bony glenoid fossa, the fibrous glenoid labrum, and the biceps tendon. Abnormalities of the labrum and glenoid fossa are easily identified by both examinations, and osseous defects of the humeral head and alterations of the biceps are ideally depicted by computed anthrotomography. Although computed anthrotomography is easier to perform and better tolerated by patients, either method of arthrotomography can serve as an effective screening test for patients undergoing evaluation of glenohumeral joint instability.

Key concepts: Medicine, Glenoid labrum, Labrum, Shoulder joint, Biceps, Biceps tendon, Fossa, Anatomy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Arthrotomography of the shoulder — Research Paper | ScholarLens