2006Unpublished venueRequires access

Riprap Sizing for Bridge Pier and Abutment Countermeasures

Lyle W. Zevenbergen, P. E. Clopper, P. F. Lagasse

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Many equations are available for sizing riprap protection for bridge piers and abutments. These design equations can give significantly different results for protecting the same installation. This paper provides an overview of a review of riprap sizing methods performed as part of the National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Project 24-23, "Riprap Design Criteria, Specifications, and Quality Control." The performance of twelve (12) pier riprap sizing equations was evaluated by comparing the predicted size against three laboratory data sets. Adjustment factors for pier shape were also evaluated because the laboratory data includes tests of square and round nose piers. Flow velocity is the primary variable for determining riprap size. One-dimensional models often do not provide accurate estimates of flow velocity for bridge abutment areas located at the ends of embankments that encroach significantly into floodplains. Therefore, 2-dimensional hydraulic modeling was performed to test methods for estimating flow velocity at abutments and guide banks and additional guidance was developed.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Many equations are available for sizing riprap protection for bridge piers and abutments. These design equations can give significantly different results for protecting the same installation. This paper provides an overview of a review of riprap sizing methods performed as part of the National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Project 24-23, "Riprap Design Criteria, Specifications, and Quality Control." The performance of twelve (12) pier riprap sizing equations was evaluated by comparing the predicted size against three laboratory data sets. Adjustment factors for pier shape were also evaluated because the laboratory data includes tests of square and round nose piers. Flow velocity is the primary variable for determining riprap size. One-dimensional models often do not provide accurate estimates of flow velocity for bridge abutment areas located at the ends of embankments that encroach significantly into floodplains. Therefore, 2-dimensional hydraulic modeling was performed to test methods for estimating flow velocity at abutments and guide banks and additional guidance was developed.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Many equations are available for sizing riprap protection for bridge piers and abutments. These design equations can give significantly different results for protecting the same installation. This paper provides an overview of a review of riprap sizing methods performed as part of the National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Project 24-23, "Riprap Design Criteria, Specifications, and Quality Control." The performance of twelve (12) pier riprap sizing equations was evaluated by comparing the predicted size against three laboratory data sets. Adjustment factors for pier shape were also evaluated because the laboratory data includes tests of square and round nose piers. Flow velocity is the primary variable for determining riprap size. One-dimensional models often do not provide accurate estimates of flow velocity for bridge abutment areas located at the ends of embankments that encroach significantly into floodplains. Therefore, 2-dimensional hydraulic modeling was performed to test methods for estimating flow velocity at abutments and guide banks and additional guidance was developed.

Key concepts: Riprap, Pier, Sizing, Abutment, Geotechnical engineering, Engineering, Bridge scour, Structural engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Riprap Sizing for Bridge Pier and Abutment Countermeasures — Research Paper | ScholarLens