Reply to Lebowitz
Felton C. Shortall
Abstract
Felton C. Shortall
Abstract
Abstract As Michael Lebowitz, in his extended review points out, The Incomplete Marx is part of ‘a growing body of work which challenges the exclusive preoccupation with Capital of so many academic Marxists’. Like Lebowitz's own work in this area, The Incomplete Marx is part of the project which seeks to go beyond the ‘logic of capital’ that we find in Capital, ‘which yields a one-sided understanding of capitalism’, in order to grasp the other essential aspect of capitalism – class struggle and proletarian subjectivity.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Abstract As Michael Lebowitz, in his extended review points out, The Incomplete Marx is part of ‘a growing body of work which challenges the exclusive preoccupation with Capital of so many academic Marxists’. Like Lebowitz's own work in this area, The Incomplete Marx is part of the project which seeks to go beyond the ‘logic of capital’ that we find in Capital, ‘which yields a one-sided understanding of capitalism’, in order to grasp the other essential aspect of capitalism – class struggle and proletarian subjectivity.
Key concepts: Proletariat, Capitalism, Subjectivity, Capital (architecture), Work (physics), GRASP, Sociology, Epistemology