Accuracy of classification of breast ultrasound findings on criteria used for description in BI-RADS for breast ultrasound
J Heinig, Ralf Witteler, Ralf Schmitz, Ludwig Kiesel, J Steinhard
Abstract
J Heinig, Ralf Witteler, Ralf Schmitz, Ludwig Kiesel, J Steinhard
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of categorization based on scoring breast ultrasound findings for malignancy on analogue criteria used for BI-RADS breast ultrasound. Materials and methods: Breast ultrasound was performed in 2462 patients at our unit. Sonographic findings were scored using analogue criteria as in BI-RADS for breast ultrasound (mass shape, margin, orientation, posterior acoustic, lesion boundary, echo pattern). Each lesion was described using these features and categorized in the categories 1 to 5 according to BI-RADS for breast ultrasound. Final categorization and biopsy results were correlated. Results: In twenty-two patients (0.9%) breast ultrasound was not evaluable because of extreme density of tissue. Normal breast ultrasound belonging to category 1 was found in 871 (35.4%) patients. Simple cysts classified in category 2 were obtained in 712 (28.9%) women. In 491 (19.9%) patients solid masses with criteria for benignity (category 3) were found. Suspect appearing masses were obtained in 225 (9.1%) and highly suggestive for malignancy were findings in 141 (5.7%) patients, according to category 4 and 5, respectively. Histologic examinations were obtained in 84 (17.1%) masses form category 3, in 97 (43.1%) form category 4 and 106 (75.2%) from category 5, respectively. Accordingly, the rate of malignant findings was 1% (n=1) in category 3, 17% (n=16) in category 4 and 94% (n=100) in category 5 findings. Conclusion: Scoring breast ultrasound findings for malignancy on criteria used for BI-RADS breast ultrasound has a high accuracy which is comparable to that obtained by BI-RADS for mammography.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of categorization based on scoring breast ultrasound findings for malignancy on analogue criteria used for BI-RADS breast ultrasound. Materials and methods: Breast ultrasound was performed in 2462 patients at our unit. Sonographic findings were scored using analogue criteria as in BI-RADS for breast ultrasound (mass shape, margin, orientation, posterior acoustic, lesion boundary, echo pattern). Each lesion was described using these features and categorized in the categories 1 to 5 according to BI-RADS for breast ultrasound. Final categorization and biopsy results were correlated. Results: In twenty-two patients (0.9%) breast ultrasound was not evaluable because of extreme density of tissue. Normal breast ultrasound belonging to category 1 was found in 871 (35.4%) patients. Simple cysts classified in category 2 were obtained in 712 (28.9%) women. In 491 (19.9%) patients solid masses with criteria for benignity (category 3) were found. Suspect appearing masses were obtained in 225 (9.1%) and highly suggestive for malignancy were findings in 141 (5.7%) patients, according to category 4 and 5, respectively. Histologic examinations were obtained in 84 (17.1%) masses form category 3, in 97 (43.1%) form category 4 and 106 (75.2%) from category 5, respectively. Accordingly, the rate of malignant findings was 1% (n=1) in category 3, 17% (n=16) in category 4 and 94% (n=100) in category 5 findings. Conclusion: Scoring breast ultrasound findings for malignancy on criteria used for BI-RADS breast ultrasound has a high accuracy which is comparable to that obtained by BI-RADS for mammography.
Key concepts: BI-RADS, Breast ultrasound, Ultrasound, Medicine, Categorization, Malignancy, Radiology, Breast imaging