1984Journal of Geophysical Research AtmospheresRequires access

The rupture process of the Great 1979 Colombia Earthquake: Evidence for the asperity model

S. L. Beck, Larry J. Ruff

Open publisher page 155 citations

Abstract

We have determined the asperity distribution in the segment of the Ecuador‐Colombia subduction zone that was ruptured by the 1979 ( M w = 8.2) and 1958 ( M w = 7.7) earthquakes. For the 1979 earthquake, we are able to document directivity in the P ‐wave source time functions and consequently, have spatially located the moment release. By combining results from both P ‐wave and surface wave directivity, we have defined three regions: (1) from 0 to 56 km northeast of the epicenter, with low moment release and a small seismic displacement, (2) the asperity, from 56 to 116 km northeast of the epicenter, with most of the moment release and a displacement of ∼6 m, and (3) a small‐displacement region from 116 to 180–240 km northeast of the epicenter. Thus the 1979 rupture zone is composed of an asperity 60 km in length, bounded by two weak (small displacement) regions. The displacement at the asperity is equal to the cumulative tectonic displacement between 1979 and 1906 (the year of the previous great earthquake in this segment). The 1958 earthquake is characterized by the rupture of a small asperity (length scale approximately 25 km) in the epicentral region. The 1958 event continued to rupture past this small epicentral asperity and stopped near the epicenter of the following 1979 event. This detailed study of the spatial variation in moment release offers strong support for the asperity model of large earthquake occurrence.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

We have determined the asperity distribution in the segment of the Ecuador‐Colombia subduction zone that was ruptured by the 1979 ( M w = 8.2) and 1958 ( M w = 7.7) earthquakes. For the 1979 earthquake, we are able to document directivity in the P ‐wave source time functions and consequently, have spatially located the moment release. By combining results from both P ‐wave and surface wave directivity, we have defined three regions: (1) from 0 to 56 km northeast of the epicenter, with low moment release and a small seismic displacement, (2) the asperity, from 56 to 116 km northeast of the epicenter, with most of the moment release and a displacement of ∼6 m, and (3) a small‐displacement region from 116 to 180–240 km northeast of the epicenter. Thus the 1979 rupture zone is composed of an asperity 60 km in length, bounded by two weak (small displacement) regions. The displacement at the asperity is equal to the cumulative tectonic displacement between 1979 and 1906 (the year of the previous great earthquake in this segment). The 1958 earthquake is characterized by the rupture of a small asperity (length scale approximately 25 km) in the epicentral region. The 1958 event continued to rupture past this small epicentral asperity and stopped near the epicenter of the following 1979 event. This detailed study of the spatial variation in moment release offers strong support for the asperity model of large earthquake occurrence.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 155 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

We have determined the asperity distribution in the segment of the Ecuador‐Colombia subduction zone that was ruptured by the 1979 ( M w = 8.2) and 1958 ( M w = 7.7) earthquakes. For the 1979 earthquake, we are able to document directivity in the P ‐wave source time functions and consequently, have spatially located the moment release. By combining results from both P ‐wave and surface wave directivity, we have defined three regions: (1) from 0 to 56 km northeast of the epicenter, with low moment release and a small seismic displacement, (2) the asperity, from 56 to 116 km northeast of the epicenter, with most of the moment release and a displacement of ∼6 m, and (3) a small‐displacement region from 116 to 180–240 km northeast of the epicenter. Thus the 1979 rupture zone is composed of an asperity 60 km in length, bounded by two weak (small displacement) regions. The displacement at the asperity is equal to the cumulative tectonic displacement between 1979 and 1906 (the year of the previous great earthquake in this segment). The 1958 earthquake is characterized by the rupture of a small asperity (length scale approximately 25 km) in the epicentral region. The 1958 event continued to rupture past this small epicentral asperity and stopped near the epicenter of the following 1979 event. This detailed study of the spatial variation in moment release offers strong support for the asperity model of large earthquake occurrence.

Key concepts: Asperity (geotechnical engineering), Epicenter, Seismology, Geology, Displacement (psychology), Seismic moment, Directivity, Induced seismicity

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The rupture process of the Great 1979 Colombia Earthquake: Evidence for the asperity model — Research Paper | ScholarLens