1965Journal of Educational AdministrationRequires access

Differentiating Teachers‘ Salaries

James P. Steffensen

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Most United States public school teachers arc paid in accordance with a salary policy which recognizes two dimensions—level of educational attainment and years of experience. Attempts to introduce a “merit” dimension have usually been abandoned. Proponents of this system have frequently justified their position on the theme of “improvement of instruction”, but it is difficult to accept the claim that there is a unique relationship between the differential and motivation regardless of the amount of the differential. Thorough evaluation and supervision programs are carried out by schools regardless of their salary programs. Yet, considerable interest exists in increasing maximum salary levels on a differential basis, if only to attract to teaching the most capable university graduates. One possible solution is the adoption of additional payments for positions of responsibility, preferably with the teachers’ organizations having a voice in the determination of the rank and pay of their colleagues.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Most United States public school teachers arc paid in accordance with a salary policy which recognizes two dimensions—level of educational attainment and years of experience. Attempts to introduce a “merit” dimension have usually been abandoned. Proponents of this system have frequently justified their position on the theme of “improvement of instruction”, but it is difficult to accept the claim that there is a unique relationship between the differential and motivation regardless of the amount of the differential. Thorough evaluation and supervision programs are carried out by schools regardless of their salary programs. Yet, considerable interest exists in increasing maximum salary levels on a differential basis, if only to attract to teaching the most capable university graduates. One possible solution is the adoption of additional payments for positions of responsibility, preferably with the teachers’ organizations having a voice in the determination of the rank and pay of their colleagues.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Most United States public school teachers arc paid in accordance with a salary policy which recognizes two dimensions—level of educational attainment and years of experience. Attempts to introduce a “merit” dimension have usually been abandoned. Proponents of this system have frequently justified their position on the theme of “improvement of instruction”, but it is difficult to accept the claim that there is a unique relationship between the differential and motivation regardless of the amount of the differential. Thorough evaluation and supervision programs are carried out by schools regardless of their salary programs. Yet, considerable interest exists in increasing maximum salary levels on a differential basis, if only to attract to teaching the most capable university graduates. One possible solution is the adoption of additional payments for positions of responsibility, preferably with the teachers’ organizations having a voice in the determination of the rank and pay of their colleagues.

Key concepts: Salary, Differential (mechanical device), Theme (computing), Payment, Merit pay, Position (finance), Rank (graph theory), Dimension (graph theory)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Differentiating Teachers‘ Salaries — Research Paper | ScholarLens