2009Lasers in Surgery and MedicineOpen access

Combination treatment of surgical, post‐traumatic and post‐herpetic scars with ablative lasers followed by fractional laser and non‐ablative laser in Asians

Yongsoo Lee

Open full text 19 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Scars are usually classified into atrophic scars, hypertrophic scars and keloids. This author would classify atrophic scars as a subclass of non-hypertrophic scars. In other words, non-hypertrophic scars encompass atrophic (depressed) scars and flat scars that are literally flat or protrude minimally above the level of adjacent normal skin, because the same treatment protocol can be used for each. It is speculated that ablative lasers can be used to sculpt the contour of scars or to remove a controlled amount of scar tissue, while at the same time, activating a regenerative cascade. On the other hand, fractional and non-ablative lasers stimulate and/or keep a proliferative phase on, together with other unique beneficial effects of each device. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty non-hypertrophic facial scars of 24 Asian patients (Fitzpatrick's skin type III-IV) were treated with ablative lasers (pulsed CO(2) and Er:YAG) followed by fractional (1,550 nm) laser and non-ablative (1,450 nm) laser alternatively every 2-3 weeks. Thirty-one pairs of pre- and post-treatment-photographs were evaluated independently by three dermatologists and two plastic surgeons, on a scale of 0-100% improvement. If there was no interval change, this was rated 0%. If there was no difference between the treated region and adjacent normal skin, it was rated 100%. The scars (20 post-traumatic, 6 surgical, 2 post-herpetic, 2 burn scars) were all over 6 months old. RESULTS: The evaluators rated an average improvement of 86.8% (median 90%). Ten of 31 pairs of photographs were rated 100%, one of which was unanimous. Each evaluator rated 2-5 pairs as having 100% improvement. CONCLUSION: This study shows the possibility that, with appropriate combinations of different lasers, we can expect complete or near-complete resolution of many types of scars. Further research and data accumulation will help to establish better protocols for each class of scars.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Scars are usually classified into atrophic scars, hypertrophic scars and keloids. This author would classify atrophic scars as a subclass of non-hypertrophic scars. In other words, non-hypertrophic scars encompass atrophic (depressed) scars and flat scars that are literally flat or protrude minimally above the level of adjacent normal skin, because the same treatment protocol can be used for each. It is speculated that ablative lasers can be used to sculpt the contour of scars or to remove a controlled amount of scar tissue, while at the same time, activating a regenerative cascade. On the other hand, fractional and non-ablative lasers stimulate and/or keep a proliferative phase on, together with other unique beneficial effects of each device. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty non-hypertrophic facial scars of 24 Asian patients (Fitzpatrick's skin type III-IV) were treated with ablative lasers (pulsed CO(2) and Er:YAG) followed by fractional (1,550 nm) laser and non-ablative (1,450 nm) laser alternatively every 2-3 weeks. Thirty-one pairs of pre- and post-treatment-photographs were evaluated independently by three dermatologists and two plastic surgeons, on a scale of 0-100% improvement. If there was no interval change, this was rated 0%. If there was no difference between the treated region and adjacent normal skin, it was rated 100%. The scars (20 post-traumatic, 6 surgical, 2 post-herpetic, 2 burn scars) were all over 6 months old. RESULTS: The evaluators rated an average improvement of 86.8% (median 90%). Ten of 31 pairs of photographs were rated 100%, one of which was unanimous. Each evaluator rated 2-5 pairs as having 100% improvement. CONCLUSION: This study shows the possibility that, with appropriate combinations of different lasers, we can expect complete or near-complete resolution of many types of scars. Further research and data accumulation will help to establish better protocols for each class of scars.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 19 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Scars are usually classified into atrophic scars, hypertrophic scars and keloids. This author would classify atrophic scars as a subclass of non-hypertrophic scars. In other words, non-hypertrophic scars encompass atrophic (depressed) scars and flat scars that are literally flat or protrude minimally above the level of adjacent normal skin, because the same treatment protocol can be used for each. It is speculated that ablative lasers can be used to sculpt the contour of scars or to remove a controlled amount of scar tissue, while at the same time, activating a regenerative cascade. On the other hand, fractional and non-ablative lasers stimulate and/or keep a proliferative phase on, together with other unique beneficial effects of each device. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty non-hypertrophic facial scars of 24 Asian patients (Fitzpatrick's skin type III-IV) were treated with ablative lasers (pulsed CO(2) and Er:YAG) followed by fractional (1,550 nm) laser and non-ablative (1,450 nm) laser alternatively every 2-3 weeks. Thirty-one pairs of pre- and post-treatment-photographs were evaluated independently by three dermatologists and two plastic surgeons, on a scale of 0-100% improvement. If there was no interval change, this was rated 0%. If there was no difference between the treated region and adjacent normal skin, it was rated 100%. The scars (20 post-traumatic, 6 surgical, 2 post-herpetic, 2 burn scars) were all over 6 months old. RESULTS: The evaluators rated an average improvement of 86.8% (median 90%). Ten of 31 pairs of photographs were rated 100%, one of which was unanimous. Each evaluator rated 2-5 pairs as having 100% improvement. CONCLUSION: This study shows the possibility that, with appropriate combinations of different lasers, we can expect complete or near-complete resolution of many types of scars. Further research and data accumulation will help to establish better protocols for each class of scars.

Key concepts: Ablative case, Scars, Medicine, Hypertrophic scars, Laser, Surgery, Dermatology, Acne scars

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Combination treatment of surgical, post‐traumatic and post‐herpetic scars with ablative lasers followed by fractional laser and non‐ablative laser in Asians — Research Paper | ScholarLens