1983Journal of PeriodontologyRequires access

Total Cementum Removal: A Realistic Objective?

Timothy J. O’Leary, Abdel H. Kafrawy

Open publisher page 67 citations

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to determine if total cementum removal from periodontally involved root surfaces was a clinically realistic objective. The experimental specimens were 36 periodontally involved teeth, extracted because of advanced periodontal disease. Eighteen teeth were from patients under age 36 while the other 18 were from patients over 36. All teeth had at least 6 mm of attachment loss on the proximal surface tested and showed no evidence of forceps damage. After removing all visible calculus, equal numbers of each tooth type in each age group were given 50 planing strokes with either a Jacquette scaler, a Gracey curet, or an Indiana University curet. Following the planing procedure the specimens were fixed, decalcified, and 7 microns thick sections prepared and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Two teeth were excluded from the evaluation due to poor orientation. In none of the remaining 34 teeth was cementum totally removed over the entire proximal test surface. There was no apparent difference between the instruments in the amount of residual cementum found. Larger amounts of residual cementum were seen in more apical areas in both age groups.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The purpose of the study was to determine if total cementum removal from periodontally involved root surfaces was a clinically realistic objective. The experimental specimens were 36 periodontally involved teeth, extracted because of advanced periodontal disease. Eighteen teeth were from patients under age 36 while the other 18 were from patients over 36. All teeth had at least 6 mm of attachment loss on the proximal surface tested and showed no evidence of forceps damage. After removing all visible calculus, equal numbers of each tooth type in each age group were given 50 planing strokes with either a Jacquette scaler, a Gracey curet, or an Indiana University curet. Following the planing procedure the specimens were fixed, decalcified, and 7 microns thick sections prepared and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Two teeth were excluded from the evaluation due to poor orientation. In none of the remaining 34 teeth was cementum totally removed over the entire proximal test surface. There was no apparent difference between the instruments in the amount of residual cementum found. Larger amounts of residual cementum were seen in more apical areas in both age groups.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 67 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The purpose of the study was to determine if total cementum removal from periodontally involved root surfaces was a clinically realistic objective. The experimental specimens were 36 periodontally involved teeth, extracted because of advanced periodontal disease. Eighteen teeth were from patients under age 36 while the other 18 were from patients over 36. All teeth had at least 6 mm of attachment loss on the proximal surface tested and showed no evidence of forceps damage. After removing all visible calculus, equal numbers of each tooth type in each age group were given 50 planing strokes with either a Jacquette scaler, a Gracey curet, or an Indiana University curet. Following the planing procedure the specimens were fixed, decalcified, and 7 microns thick sections prepared and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Two teeth were excluded from the evaluation due to poor orientation. In none of the remaining 34 teeth was cementum totally removed over the entire proximal test surface. There was no apparent difference between the instruments in the amount of residual cementum found. Larger amounts of residual cementum were seen in more apical areas in both age groups.

Key concepts: Cementum, Dental cementum, Dentistry, Periodontal disease, Medicine, Orthodontics, Significant difference, Dentin

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Total Cementum Removal: A Realistic Objective? — Research Paper | ScholarLens