2012•GéotechniqueRequires access

A hysteretic soil-water retention model accounting for cyclic variations of suction and void ratio

Domenico Gallipoli

Open publisher page 135 citations

Abstract

The paper presents a water retention model capable of predicting the hysteretic response of soils during both wetting–drying cycles at constant void ratio and compression–swelling cycles at constant suction. In the proposed model two main surfaces – the main wetting and main drying surfaces – enclose the domain of attainable soil states in the degree of saturation–suction–void ratio space. Inside this domain, the variation of degree of saturation is governed by a reversible scanning law, which describes the transition from one main surface to the other. A simplified calibration procedure is presented to select the values of the four parameters defining the two main surfaces by using a minimum of two compression tests at constant suction and one drying test at constant mean net stress. Model computations are validated against results from an experimental campaign on a compacted mixture of bentonite and kaolin. The proposed formulation is capable of capturing important soil features, such as the influence of hydraulic hysteresis and deformation on the variation of degree of saturation, and the dependence of water retention behaviour during compression on previous wetting–drying history. Moreover, during main wetting or main drying at high suction (i.e. at low saturation), the model correctly predicts a ‘virgin' retention line that uniquely relates water ratio and suction regardless of the current value of void ratio.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The paper presents a water retention model capable of predicting the hysteretic response of soils during both wetting–drying cycles at constant void ratio and compression–swelling cycles at constant suction. In the proposed model two main surfaces – the main wetting and main drying surfaces – enclose the domain of attainable soil states in the degree of saturation–suction–void ratio space. Inside this domain, the variation of degree of saturation is governed by a reversible scanning law, which describes the transition from one main surface to the other. A simplified calibration procedure is presented to select the values of the four parameters defining the two main surfaces by using a minimum of two compression tests at constant suction and one drying test at constant mean net stress. Model computations are validated against results from an experimental campaign on a compacted mixture of bentonite and kaolin. The proposed formulation is capable of capturing important soil features, such as the influence of hydraulic hysteresis and deformation on the variation of degree of saturation, and the dependence of water retention behaviour during compression on previous wetting–drying history. Moreover, during main wetting or main drying at high suction (i.e. at low saturation), the model correctly predicts a ‘virgin' retention line that uniquely relates water ratio and suction regardless of the current value of void ratio.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 135 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The paper presents a water retention model capable of predicting the hysteretic response of soils during both wetting–drying cycles at constant void ratio and compression–swelling cycles at constant suction. In the proposed model two main surfaces – the main wetting and main drying surfaces – enclose the domain of attainable soil states in the degree of saturation–suction–void ratio space. Inside this domain, the variation of degree of saturation is governed by a reversible scanning law, which describes the transition from one main surface to the other. A simplified calibration procedure is presented to select the values of the four parameters defining the two main surfaces by using a minimum of two compression tests at constant suction and one drying test at constant mean net stress. Model computations are validated against results from an experimental campaign on a compacted mixture of bentonite and kaolin. The proposed formulation is capable of capturing important soil features, such as the influence of hydraulic hysteresis and deformation on the variation of degree of saturation, and the dependence of water retention behaviour during compression on previous wetting–drying history. Moreover, during main wetting or main drying at high suction (i.e. at low saturation), the model correctly predicts a ‘virgin' retention line that uniquely relates water ratio and suction regardless of the current value of void ratio.

Key concepts: Void ratio, Wetting, Degree of saturation, Water retention, Materials science, Void (composites), Saturation (graph theory), Geotechnical engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A hysteretic soil-water retention model accounting for cyclic variations of suction and void ratio — Research Paper | ScholarLens