1996Human Dimensions of WildlifeRequires access

Attitudes toward state—level threatened and endangered species protection inKansas

Philip S. Cook, Ted T. Cable

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

In addition to the federal Endangered Species Act (ESA), individual states can have state—level legislation that protects species. While the ESA has high levels of public support, it was not clear that state—level programs also do. This research examined state residents’ attitudes toward a state‐level threatened and endangered species program in Kansas. Overall, high levels of support were found. Demographic differences existed, with older respondents having less favorable attitudes towards species protection. Respondents who had been required to obtain a state threatened and endangered species permit before undertaking a development project had less favorable attitudes toward the species protection program than the general public, but a majority still support having a state—level threatened and endangered species protection program.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In addition to the federal Endangered Species Act (ESA), individual states can have state—level legislation that protects species. While the ESA has high levels of public support, it was not clear that state—level programs also do. This research examined state residents’ attitudes toward a state‐level threatened and endangered species program in Kansas. Overall, high levels of support were found. Demographic differences existed, with older respondents having less favorable attitudes towards species protection. Respondents who had been required to obtain a state threatened and endangered species permit before undertaking a development project had less favorable attitudes toward the species protection program than the general public, but a majority still support having a state—level threatened and endangered species protection program.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In addition to the federal Endangered Species Act (ESA), individual states can have state—level legislation that protects species. While the ESA has high levels of public support, it was not clear that state—level programs also do. This research examined state residents’ attitudes toward a state‐level threatened and endangered species program in Kansas. Overall, high levels of support were found. Demographic differences existed, with older respondents having less favorable attitudes towards species protection. Respondents who had been required to obtain a state threatened and endangered species permit before undertaking a development project had less favorable attitudes toward the species protection program than the general public, but a majority still support having a state—level threatened and endangered species protection program.

Key concepts: Endangered species, Threatened species, Conservation-dependent species, Legislation, Environmental protection, State (computer science), Geography, Ecology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Attitudes toward state—level threatened and endangered species protection inKansas — Research Paper | ScholarLens