Attitudes toward state—level threatened and endangered species protection inKansas
Philip S. Cook, Ted T. Cable
Abstract
Philip S. Cook, Ted T. Cable
Abstract
In addition to the federal Endangered Species Act (ESA), individual states can have state—level legislation that protects species. While the ESA has high levels of public support, it was not clear that state—level programs also do. This research examined state residents’ attitudes toward a state‐level threatened and endangered species program in Kansas. Overall, high levels of support were found. Demographic differences existed, with older respondents having less favorable attitudes towards species protection. Respondents who had been required to obtain a state threatened and endangered species permit before undertaking a development project had less favorable attitudes toward the species protection program than the general public, but a majority still support having a state—level threatened and endangered species protection program.
OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In addition to the federal Endangered Species Act (ESA), individual states can have state—level legislation that protects species. While the ESA has high levels of public support, it was not clear that state—level programs also do. This research examined state residents’ attitudes toward a state‐level threatened and endangered species program in Kansas. Overall, high levels of support were found. Demographic differences existed, with older respondents having less favorable attitudes towards species protection. Respondents who had been required to obtain a state threatened and endangered species permit before undertaking a development project had less favorable attitudes toward the species protection program than the general public, but a majority still support having a state—level threatened and endangered species protection program.
Key concepts: Endangered species, Threatened species, Conservation-dependent species, Legislation, Environmental protection, State (computer science), Geography, Ecology