The transformations of the petty bourgeoisie and the state in post‐colonial Zaire
Jacques Depelchin
Abstract
Jacques Depelchin
Abstract
In this overview of the changing character of class relations in Zaire, the author traces the origins and development of the Zairean bourgeoisie. A distinction is made between the ‘rising’ or ‘new’ bourgeoisie and the ‘state’ bourgeoisie and there follows an analysis of the struggle for control of the state between these two sections of the Zairean bourgeoisie and the role of international capital in this struggle. International capital is seen to play a role which is used to reinforce the position of the state bourgeoisie, but the contradictions between these two fractions are still being played out, not least through the changing economic policies of the Mobutu regime. Depelchin argues against the tendency on the left to view Zaire merely as the personal and corrupt fiefdom of Mobutu without proper consideration of the obstacles to socialist change embedded in the developing capitalist relations.
OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In this overview of the changing character of class relations in Zaire, the author traces the origins and development of the Zairean bourgeoisie. A distinction is made between the ‘rising’ or ‘new’ bourgeoisie and the ‘state’ bourgeoisie and there follows an analysis of the struggle for control of the state between these two sections of the Zairean bourgeoisie and the role of international capital in this struggle. International capital is seen to play a role which is used to reinforce the position of the state bourgeoisie, but the contradictions between these two fractions are still being played out, not least through the changing economic policies of the Mobutu regime. Depelchin argues against the tendency on the left to view Zaire merely as the personal and corrupt fiefdom of Mobutu without proper consideration of the obstacles to socialist change embedded in the developing capitalist relations.
Key concepts: Petite bourgeoisie, Colonialism, State (computer science), Economics, Bourgeoisie, Political economy, Political science, Economic history