1996•SpineRequires access

Pitfalls in the Measurement of Bone Mineral Density by Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry

M. Darryl Antonacci, Darrell S. Hanson, Michael H. Heggeness

Open publisher page 42 citations

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN: Fifty-three human thoracic and lumbar vertebrae were analyzed by dual energy x-ray absorptiomety to obtain projectional (g/cm2) and volumetric (g/cm3) bone mineral density. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effect of volume on the measurement of bone mineral density by DEXA. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Despite the widespread use of dual energy x-ray absorptiomety to measure bone mineral density expressed as grams per projectional unit area (g/cm2), the effect of volume has been ignored in many published biomechanical studies. METHODS: Projectional bone mineral density (g/cm2) of fifty-three human vertebrae was obtained by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry measurement. This was compared to bone mineral density expressed as grams per unit volume. RESULTS: Many specimens with near equal projectional bone mineral density were demonstrated to have significantly different true densities when measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiomety in grams per unit volume. The difference in true bone mineral density for these specimens ranged from 24.1% to 139%. CONCLUSION: The effect of volume on bone mineral density data based on projectional areas can cause very significant perturbations of the data in biomechanical studies.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

STUDY DESIGN: Fifty-three human thoracic and lumbar vertebrae were analyzed by dual energy x-ray absorptiomety to obtain projectional (g/cm2) and volumetric (g/cm3) bone mineral density. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effect of volume on the measurement of bone mineral density by DEXA. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Despite the widespread use of dual energy x-ray absorptiomety to measure bone mineral density expressed as grams per projectional unit area (g/cm2), the effect of volume has been ignored in many published biomechanical studies. METHODS: Projectional bone mineral density (g/cm2) of fifty-three human vertebrae was obtained by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry measurement. This was compared to bone mineral density expressed as grams per unit volume. RESULTS: Many specimens with near equal projectional bone mineral density were demonstrated to have significantly different true densities when measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiomety in grams per unit volume. The difference in true bone mineral density for these specimens ranged from 24.1% to 139%. CONCLUSION: The effect of volume on bone mineral density data based on projectional areas can cause very significant perturbations of the data in biomechanical studies.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 42 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

STUDY DESIGN: Fifty-three human thoracic and lumbar vertebrae were analyzed by dual energy x-ray absorptiomety to obtain projectional (g/cm2) and volumetric (g/cm3) bone mineral density. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effect of volume on the measurement of bone mineral density by DEXA. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Despite the widespread use of dual energy x-ray absorptiomety to measure bone mineral density expressed as grams per projectional unit area (g/cm2), the effect of volume has been ignored in many published biomechanical studies. METHODS: Projectional bone mineral density (g/cm2) of fifty-three human vertebrae was obtained by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry measurement. This was compared to bone mineral density expressed as grams per unit volume. RESULTS: Many specimens with near equal projectional bone mineral density were demonstrated to have significantly different true densities when measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiomety in grams per unit volume. The difference in true bone mineral density for these specimens ranged from 24.1% to 139%. CONCLUSION: The effect of volume on bone mineral density data based on projectional areas can cause very significant perturbations of the data in biomechanical studies.

Key concepts: Bone mineral, Medicine, Dual energy, Volume (thermodynamics), Bone density, Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, Lumbar vertebrae, Lumbar

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Pitfalls in the Measurement of Bone Mineral Density by Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry — Research Paper | ScholarLens