1986Transactions of the American Fisheries SocietyRequires access

Salmon and Steelhead Abundance in the Columbia River in the Nineteenth Century

D. W. Chapman

Open publisher page 135 citations

Abstract

I estimated peak runs of Pacific salmon Oncorhynchus spp. and steelhead Salmo gairdneri in the Columbia River during the 40 years centered on 1900 on the basis of peak-period commercial catches and probable optimum exploitation rates. Peak-period catches were estimated from mean catch weights during the five consecutive years of greatest total harvest, and from mean weights of fish reported in the early literature. These catches were 1,700,000 summer chinook salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha (1881–1885), 382,000 steelhead (1892–1896), 1,100,000 fall chinook salmon (1915–1919), 400,000 spring chinook salmon (approximately), 476,000 coho salmon O. kisutch (1894–1898), 1,915,000 sockeye salmon O. nerka (1883–1887), and 359,000 chum salmon O. keta (1915–1919). Optimum harvest rates for maximum sustained yield from nonhatchery stocks were obtained from literature: 0.77 for coho salmon, 0.73 for sockeye salmon, 0.68 for spring and summer chinook salmon, 0.88 for fall chinook salmon, 0.69 for steelhead, and 0.48 for chum salmon. Peak-period runs estimated from optimum harvest rates were 2,623,000 sockeye salmon, 4,338,000 chinook salmon, 618,000 coho salmon, 554,000 steelhead, and 748,000 chum salmon–8,881,000 adults altogether. On the basis of the more probable harvest rates that produced overfishing (0.80–0.88), total run size was about 7,505,000 adults, a single best estimate of total predevelopment runs. I discuss aboriginal catch in relation to the theory that decimation of Indian populations after 1800 permitted salmon and steelhead stocks to expand. Using the shape of stock-recruitment functions and appropriate commercial harvest rates, I support the alternative hypothesis that salmon stocks actually decreased in the early 1800s with decreased Indian harvest, then increased after 1850 as commercial fisheries developed, and finally decreased in response to overfishing. Environmental degradation exacerbated the latter decrease.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

I estimated peak runs of Pacific salmon Oncorhynchus spp. and steelhead Salmo gairdneri in the Columbia River during the 40 years centered on 1900 on the basis of peak-period commercial catches and probable optimum exploitation rates. Peak-period catches were estimated from mean catch weights during the five consecutive years of greatest total harvest, and from mean weights of fish reported in the early literature. These catches were 1,700,000 summer chinook salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha (1881–1885), 382,000 steelhead (1892–1896), 1,100,000 fall chinook salmon (1915–1919), 400,000 spring chinook salmon (approximately), 476,000 coho salmon O. kisutch (1894–1898), 1,915,000 sockeye salmon O. nerka (1883–1887), and 359,000 chum salmon O. keta (1915–1919). Optimum harvest rates for maximum sustained yield from nonhatchery stocks were obtained from literature: 0.77 for coho salmon, 0.73 for sockeye salmon, 0.68 for spring and summer chinook salmon, 0.88 for fall chinook salmon, 0.69 for steelhead, and 0.48 for chum salmon. Peak-period runs estimated from optimum harvest rates were 2,623,000 sockeye salmon, 4,338,000 chinook salmon, 618,000 coho salmon, 554,000 steelhead, and 748,000 chum salmon–8,881,000 adults altogether. On the basis of the more probable harvest rates that produced overfishing (0.80–0.88), total run size was about 7,505,000 adults, a single best estimate of total predevelopment runs. I discuss aboriginal catch in relation to the theory that decimation of Indian populations after 1800 permitted salmon and steelhead stocks to expand. Using the shape of stock-recruitment functions and appropriate commercial harvest rates, I support the alternative hypothesis that salmon stocks actually decreased in the early 1800s with decreased Indian harvest, then increased after 1850 as commercial fisheries developed, and finally decreased in response to overfishing. Environmental degradation exacerbated the latter decrease.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 135 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

I estimated peak runs of Pacific salmon Oncorhynchus spp. and steelhead Salmo gairdneri in the Columbia River during the 40 years centered on 1900 on the basis of peak-period commercial catches and probable optimum exploitation rates. Peak-period catches were estimated from mean catch weights during the five consecutive years of greatest total harvest, and from mean weights of fish reported in the early literature. These catches were 1,700,000 summer chinook salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha (1881–1885), 382,000 steelhead (1892–1896), 1,100,000 fall chinook salmon (1915–1919), 400,000 spring chinook salmon (approximately), 476,000 coho salmon O. kisutch (1894–1898), 1,915,000 sockeye salmon O. nerka (1883–1887), and 359,000 chum salmon O. keta (1915–1919). Optimum harvest rates for maximum sustained yield from nonhatchery stocks were obtained from literature: 0.77 for coho salmon, 0.73 for sockeye salmon, 0.68 for spring and summer chinook salmon, 0.88 for fall chinook salmon, 0.69 for steelhead, and 0.48 for chum salmon. Peak-period runs estimated from optimum harvest rates were 2,623,000 sockeye salmon, 4,338,000 chinook salmon, 618,000 coho salmon, 554,000 steelhead, and 748,000 chum salmon–8,881,000 adults altogether. On the basis of the more probable harvest rates that produced overfishing (0.80–0.88), total run size was about 7,505,000 adults, a single best estimate of total predevelopment runs. I discuss aboriginal catch in relation to the theory that decimation of Indian populations after 1800 permitted salmon and steelhead stocks to expand. Using the shape of stock-recruitment functions and appropriate commercial harvest rates, I support the alternative hypothesis that salmon stocks actually decreased in the early 1800s with decreased Indian harvest, then increased after 1850 as commercial fisheries developed, and finally decreased in response to overfishing. Environmental degradation exacerbated the latter decrease.

Key concepts: Oncorhynchus, Chinook wind, Fishery, Salmo, Rainbow trout, Fish <Actinopterygii>, Salmonidae, Biology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Salmon and Steelhead Abundance in the Columbia River in the Nineteenth Century — Research Paper | ScholarLens