1969BMJOpen access

Timing of Atropine and Neostigmine in the Reversal of Muscle Relaxants

J G Hannington-Kiff

Open full text 12 citations

Abstract

The antimuscarinic effects of atropine were studied in 46 patients to whom neostigmine had been given after operation to reverse the action of a muscle relaxant. Neostigmine was given to alternate patients three minutes after, or together with, atropine, and the effects of the two procedures were compared by measuring the secretions which collected in the buccal and oropharyngeal cavities and observing the heart rate.It was found that the glands of the oral cavity were stimulated to a greater extent when neostigmine was given with atropine than after atropine. Any dose of atropine sufficient to inhibit peristaltic movements of the bowel is more than enough to block completely secretion by the salivary glands, and the appearance of some secretion in all cases after the administration of neostigmine suggests that the bowel was at liberty to react to the neostigmine in every case, but perhaps particularly so when atropine and neostigmine were given mixed. The integrity of an anastomosis of the bowel could be endangered by vigorous peristalsis in the early postoperative period.Electrocardiograms in about half the patients from each group confirmed earlier work that the muscarinic effects of neostigmine on the heart can be prevented by giving the atropine either before or together with the neostigmine.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The antimuscarinic effects of atropine were studied in 46 patients to whom neostigmine had been given after operation to reverse the action of a muscle relaxant. Neostigmine was given to alternate patients three minutes after, or together with, atropine, and the effects of the two procedures were compared by measuring the secretions which collected in the buccal and oropharyngeal cavities and observing the heart rate.It was found that the glands of the oral cavity were stimulated to a greater extent when neostigmine was given with atropine than after atropine. Any dose of atropine sufficient to inhibit peristaltic movements of the bowel is more than enough to block completely secretion by the salivary glands, and the appearance of some secretion in all cases after the administration of neostigmine suggests that the bowel was at liberty to react to the neostigmine in every case, but perhaps particularly so when atropine and neostigmine were given mixed. The integrity of an anastomosis of the bowel could be endangered by vigorous peristalsis in the early postoperative period.Electrocardiograms in about half the patients from each group confirmed earlier work that the muscarinic effects of neostigmine on the heart can be prevented by giving the atropine either before or together with the neostigmine.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 12 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The antimuscarinic effects of atropine were studied in 46 patients to whom neostigmine had been given after operation to reverse the action of a muscle relaxant. Neostigmine was given to alternate patients three minutes after, or together with, atropine, and the effects of the two procedures were compared by measuring the secretions which collected in the buccal and oropharyngeal cavities and observing the heart rate.It was found that the glands of the oral cavity were stimulated to a greater extent when neostigmine was given with atropine than after atropine. Any dose of atropine sufficient to inhibit peristaltic movements of the bowel is more than enough to block completely secretion by the salivary glands, and the appearance of some secretion in all cases after the administration of neostigmine suggests that the bowel was at liberty to react to the neostigmine in every case, but perhaps particularly so when atropine and neostigmine were given mixed. The integrity of an anastomosis of the bowel could be endangered by vigorous peristalsis in the early postoperative period.Electrocardiograms in about half the patients from each group confirmed earlier work that the muscarinic effects of neostigmine on the heart can be prevented by giving the atropine either before or together with the neostigmine.

Key concepts: Neostigmine, Atropine, Parasympatholytic, Medicine, Anesthesia, Peristalsis, Muscarinic acetylcholine receptor, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Timing of Atropine and Neostigmine in the Reversal of Muscle Relaxants — Research Paper | ScholarLens