2000Journal of Interventional CardiologyOpen access

Directional Coronary Atherectomy of In‐stent Restenosis: A Two‐Center Experience

Werner Haberbosch, W. Waas, Bernd Waldecker, H. Heizmann, Hans Hölschermann, Matthias Rau, Harald Tillmanns

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

Background: Tissue proliferation is the major cause of in‐stent restenosis (ISR). Thus, debulking of material should be the most favorable method to treat ISR. The present study was performed to test the clinical and angiographic outcome of directional coronary atherectomy (DCA) in the treatment of restenosis within different stents. Methods and Results: Fifty patients with ISR in single stents (12 Palrnaz‐Schatz stents, 8 Pura stents, 10 Multilink stents, 10 NIR stents, 8 Wallstents, and 2 Microstents) underwent DCA with adjunctive balloon angioplasty in 38 patients. Primary success was achieved in 48 patients (96%). Two patients developed CK‐MB elevations, one with a Q‐wave infarction. Some minor technical problems occurred with respect to the different stent types. The percent diameter stenosis decreased from 76 ± 7% at baseline to 29 ± 6% after atherectomy (P < 0.0001) and 20 ± 4% after adjunctive PTCA, and it increased to 45 ± 19% at 4‐month angiography (P < 0.0001). Angiographic restenosis occurred in 14 (29.2%) of 48 patients who were reevaluated after 4 months. Conclusion: While DCA is able to remove u significant amount of intimal tissue in selected patients with in‐stent restenosis, new atherectomy catheter designs are required to make this a feasible and safe procedure.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Background: Tissue proliferation is the major cause of in‐stent restenosis (ISR). Thus, debulking of material should be the most favorable method to treat ISR. The present study was performed to test the clinical and angiographic outcome of directional coronary atherectomy (DCA) in the treatment of restenosis within different stents. Methods and Results: Fifty patients with ISR in single stents (12 Palrnaz‐Schatz stents, 8 Pura stents, 10 Multilink stents, 10 NIR stents, 8 Wallstents, and 2 Microstents) underwent DCA with adjunctive balloon angioplasty in 38 patients. Primary success was achieved in 48 patients (96%). Two patients developed CK‐MB elevations, one with a Q‐wave infarction. Some minor technical problems occurred with respect to the different stent types. The percent diameter stenosis decreased from 76 ± 7% at baseline to 29 ± 6% after atherectomy (P < 0.0001) and 20 ± 4% after adjunctive PTCA, and it increased to 45 ± 19% at 4‐month angiography (P < 0.0001). Angiographic restenosis occurred in 14 (29.2%) of 48 patients who were reevaluated after 4 months. Conclusion: While DCA is able to remove u significant amount of intimal tissue in selected patients with in‐stent restenosis, new atherectomy catheter designs are required to make this a feasible and safe procedure.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Background: Tissue proliferation is the major cause of in‐stent restenosis (ISR). Thus, debulking of material should be the most favorable method to treat ISR. The present study was performed to test the clinical and angiographic outcome of directional coronary atherectomy (DCA) in the treatment of restenosis within different stents. Methods and Results: Fifty patients with ISR in single stents (12 Palrnaz‐Schatz stents, 8 Pura stents, 10 Multilink stents, 10 NIR stents, 8 Wallstents, and 2 Microstents) underwent DCA with adjunctive balloon angioplasty in 38 patients. Primary success was achieved in 48 patients (96%). Two patients developed CK‐MB elevations, one with a Q‐wave infarction. Some minor technical problems occurred with respect to the different stent types. The percent diameter stenosis decreased from 76 ± 7% at baseline to 29 ± 6% after atherectomy (P < 0.0001) and 20 ± 4% after adjunctive PTCA, and it increased to 45 ± 19% at 4‐month angiography (P < 0.0001). Angiographic restenosis occurred in 14 (29.2%) of 48 patients who were reevaluated after 4 months. Conclusion: While DCA is able to remove u significant amount of intimal tissue in selected patients with in‐stent restenosis, new atherectomy catheter designs are required to make this a feasible and safe procedure.

Key concepts: Medicine, Restenosis, Atherectomy, Stent, Angioplasty, Debulking, Stenosis, Balloon

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Directional Coronary Atherectomy of In‐stent Restenosis: A Two‐Center Experience — Research Paper | ScholarLens