Diagnosing atmosphere‐ocean general circulation model errors relevant to the terrestrial biosphere using the Köppen climate classification
Anand Gnanadesikan, Ronald J. Stouffer
Abstract
Anand Gnanadesikan, Ronald J. Stouffer
Abstract
Coupled atmosphere‐ocean‐land‐sea ice climate models (AOGCMs) are often tuned using physical variables like temperature and precipitation with the goal of minimizing properties such as the root‐mean‐square error. As the community moves towards modeling the earth system, it is important to note that not all biases have equivalent impacts on biology. Bioclimatic classification systems provide means of filtering model errors so as to bring out those impacts that may be particularly important for the terrestrial biosphere. We examine one such diagnostic, the classic system of Köppen, and show that it can provide an “early warning” of which model biases are likely to produce serious biases in the land biosphere. Moreover, it provides a rough evaluation criterion for the performance of dynamic vegetation models. State‐of‐the art AOGCMs fail to capture the correct Köppen zone in about 20–30% of the land area excluding Antarctica, and misassign a similar fraction to the wrong subzone.
OpenAlex reports 65 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Coupled atmosphere‐ocean‐land‐sea ice climate models (AOGCMs) are often tuned using physical variables like temperature and precipitation with the goal of minimizing properties such as the root‐mean‐square error. As the community moves towards modeling the earth system, it is important to note that not all biases have equivalent impacts on biology. Bioclimatic classification systems provide means of filtering model errors so as to bring out those impacts that may be particularly important for the terrestrial biosphere. We examine one such diagnostic, the classic system of Köppen, and show that it can provide an “early warning” of which model biases are likely to produce serious biases in the land biosphere. Moreover, it provides a rough evaluation criterion for the performance of dynamic vegetation models. State‐of‐the art AOGCMs fail to capture the correct Köppen zone in about 20–30% of the land area excluding Antarctica, and misassign a similar fraction to the wrong subzone.
Key concepts: Biosphere, Biosphere model, Environmental science, Climatology, Atmosphere (unit), Vegetation (pathology), Precipitation, Climate model