2013•Unpublished venueRequires access

DE algorithm based comparison between two different combinations of FACTS devices under single line outage contingency condition

Luke Jebaraj, N. Muralikrishnan, C. Christober Asir Rajan

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

This paper proposes to run the Newton-Raphson load flow program with two different combinations of FACTS devices (TCSC with SVC and SSSC with SVC) separately and compare the results behind the voltage stability limit improvement and active power loss minimization scenario. The line based voltage stability indicator is used for voltage stability assessment. Differential Evolution (DE) algorithm is exploited for optimization of the voltage stability limit, active power loss and location and size of FACTS devices. The effectiveness of the proposed algorithm is validated by carrying out on the standard IEEE 30 bus system under single line outage contingency conditions.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper proposes to run the Newton-Raphson load flow program with two different combinations of FACTS devices (TCSC with SVC and SSSC with SVC) separately and compare the results behind the voltage stability limit improvement and active power loss minimization scenario. The line based voltage stability indicator is used for voltage stability assessment. Differential Evolution (DE) algorithm is exploited for optimization of the voltage stability limit, active power loss and location and size of FACTS devices. The effectiveness of the proposed algorithm is validated by carrying out on the standard IEEE 30 bus system under single line outage contingency conditions.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper proposes to run the Newton-Raphson load flow program with two different combinations of FACTS devices (TCSC with SVC and SSSC with SVC) separately and compare the results behind the voltage stability limit improvement and active power loss minimization scenario. The line based voltage stability indicator is used for voltage stability assessment. Differential Evolution (DE) algorithm is exploited for optimization of the voltage stability limit, active power loss and location and size of FACTS devices. The effectiveness of the proposed algorithm is validated by carrying out on the standard IEEE 30 bus system under single line outage contingency conditions.

Key concepts: Limit (mathematics), Power flow, Stability (learning theory), Voltage, Control theory (sociology), Line (geometry), Minification, Electric power system

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
DE algorithm based comparison between two different combinations of FACTS devices under single line outage contingency condition — Research Paper | ScholarLens