2011Contemporary PoliticsRequires access

Opportunities in action: the case of the US Computer TakeBack Campaign

Junpeng Li

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

This article examines the rise and consequences of the Computer TakeBack Campaign in the USA, and argues that the campaign's achievements can be attributed to its active engagement with the economic, political, and discursive opportunity structures. First, the campaign changed the political opportunity structure and built political legitimacy for itself. Second, the campaign took advantage of the economic opportunity structure, created the leader/laggard frame, embarrassed its target, and utilized forces of market competition to push the Dell Corporation to change its policy. Third, the campaign created a favourable discursive opportunity structure by mobilizing college students and framing the e-waste crisis as a moral issue. Traditional political process theory has been criticized for being overly structuralist and for focusing solely on political movements. This case study shows that a modified understanding of opportunities can enhance the explanatory power of the traditional approach.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This article examines the rise and consequences of the Computer TakeBack Campaign in the USA, and argues that the campaign's achievements can be attributed to its active engagement with the economic, political, and discursive opportunity structures. First, the campaign changed the political opportunity structure and built political legitimacy for itself. Second, the campaign took advantage of the economic opportunity structure, created the leader/laggard frame, embarrassed its target, and utilized forces of market competition to push the Dell Corporation to change its policy. Third, the campaign created a favourable discursive opportunity structure by mobilizing college students and framing the e-waste crisis as a moral issue. Traditional political process theory has been criticized for being overly structuralist and for focusing solely on political movements. This case study shows that a modified understanding of opportunities can enhance the explanatory power of the traditional approach.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This article examines the rise and consequences of the Computer TakeBack Campaign in the USA, and argues that the campaign's achievements can be attributed to its active engagement with the economic, political, and discursive opportunity structures. First, the campaign changed the political opportunity structure and built political legitimacy for itself. Second, the campaign took advantage of the economic opportunity structure, created the leader/laggard frame, embarrassed its target, and utilized forces of market competition to push the Dell Corporation to change its policy. Third, the campaign created a favourable discursive opportunity structure by mobilizing college students and framing the e-waste crisis as a moral issue. Traditional political process theory has been criticized for being overly structuralist and for focusing solely on political movements. This case study shows that a modified understanding of opportunities can enhance the explanatory power of the traditional approach.

Key concepts: Political opportunity, Opportunity structures, Framing (construction), Politics, Legitimacy, Corporation, Political science, Political economy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Opportunities in action: the case of the US Computer TakeBack Campaign — Research Paper | ScholarLens