A Novel High Intensity Interval Training Intervention Increases Aerobic And Anaerobic Capacity In Soccer Players
Chris Easton, Robert A. Scott, Andrew J. Cathcart
Abstract
Chris Easton, Robert A. Scott, Andrew J. Cathcart
Abstract
Previous studies have established that interval training consisting of 4 bouts of exercise at 90-95% maximum heart rate (HRmax) followed by a 3 min recovery period results in an increase in aerobic capacity but does not improve 10m sprint time in soccer players (McMillan et al. Br J Sports Med 39: 273-277, 2005). However, running during competitive matches tends to be more intermittent and at a higher intensity (Withers et al. J Hum Mov Stud 8: 159-176, 1982) suggesting that this training intervention may not be optimal. PURPOSE: To examine the effects of a novel high intensity interval training (HIIT) intervention on the aerobic and anaerobic capacity of soccer players compared to prevalent training methods. METHODS: The aerobic and anaerobic capacities of 26 collegiate level male soccer players were assessed pre- and post-training by a 20m multi-stage fitness test and a 5m multiple shuttle test (Boddington et al. J Sports Sci 19: 223-228, 2001). Participants were matched for aerobic capacity and assigned to one of three training groups, and trained twice per week for 4 weeks. One group participated in a novel HIIT intervention consisting of a series of 30 s shuttle runs at speeds above the velocity at aerobic capacity, interspersed with 30 s periods of rest. The second group completed interval training (IT) consisting of 4 bouts of 4 min running at 90-95% HRmax followed by a 3 min rest period. The final group completed continuous training (CT) involving a continuous 28 min run at 70-80% HRmax. RESULTS: Aerobic capacity increased significantly in all groups (HIIT: 6.7 ± 4.1%; p < 0.001, IT: 6.5 ± 2.2%; p < 0.01, CT: 3.9 ± 2.6%; p < 0.01). The distance covered during the anaerobic performance test increased significantly in the HIIT and IT groups (HIIT: 31 ± 21 m; p < 0.01, IT: 14 ± 20 m; p < 0.05) and increased by a small but non-significant distance in the CT group (12 ± 13 m; p = 0.06). CONCLUSION: IT and HIIT interventions result in a significant increase in both aerobic and anaerobic capacity and therefore appear to be effective methods of fitness training for soccer players.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Previous studies have established that interval training consisting of 4 bouts of exercise at 90-95% maximum heart rate (HRmax) followed by a 3 min recovery period results in an increase in aerobic capacity but does not improve 10m sprint time in soccer players (McMillan et al. Br J Sports Med 39: 273-277, 2005). However, running during competitive matches tends to be more intermittent and at a higher intensity (Withers et al. J Hum Mov Stud 8: 159-176, 1982) suggesting that this training intervention may not be optimal. PURPOSE: To examine the effects of a novel high intensity interval training (HIIT) intervention on the aerobic and anaerobic capacity of soccer players compared to prevalent training methods. METHODS: The aerobic and anaerobic capacities of 26 collegiate level male soccer players were assessed pre- and post-training by a 20m multi-stage fitness test and a 5m multiple shuttle test (Boddington et al. J Sports Sci 19: 223-228, 2001). Participants were matched for aerobic capacity and assigned to one of three training groups, and trained twice per week for 4 weeks. One group participated in a novel HIIT intervention consisting of a series of 30 s shuttle runs at speeds above the velocity at aerobic capacity, interspersed with 30 s periods of rest. The second group completed interval training (IT) consisting of 4 bouts of 4 min running at 90-95% HRmax followed by a 3 min rest period. The final group completed continuous training (CT) involving a continuous 28 min run at 70-80% HRmax. RESULTS: Aerobic capacity increased significantly in all groups (HIIT: 6.7 ± 4.1%; p < 0.001, IT: 6.5 ± 2.2%; p < 0.01, CT: 3.9 ± 2.6%; p < 0.01). The distance covered during the anaerobic performance test increased significantly in the HIIT and IT groups (HIIT: 31 ± 21 m; p < 0.01, IT: 14 ± 20 m; p < 0.05) and increased by a small but non-significant distance in the CT group (12 ± 13 m; p = 0.06). CONCLUSION: IT and HIIT interventions result in a significant increase in both aerobic and anaerobic capacity and therefore appear to be effective methods of fitness training for soccer players.
Key concepts: Interval training, Anaerobic exercise, Sprint, Aerobic capacity, High-intensity interval training, Multi-stage fitness test, Heart rate, Physical therapy