Genetic and Environmental Variation in Clutch Size of the Great Tit (Parus major)
J.H. Van Balen, Arie J. van Noordwijk, W. Scharloo
Abstract
Open-access reader
J.H. Van Balen, Arie J. van Noordwijk, W. Scharloo
Abstract
Open-access reader
An analysis is made of genetic and non-genetic components in the number of eggs in the completed first clutch of the Great Tit.1) It is doubtful whether a causal relation between density and clutch size exists.2) There is hardly a systematic effect of age on clutch size.3) There is an annual variation in clutch size with similar changes in individual females in the same population, but it is hardly correlated between populations.This emphasizes a lack of genotype-environment interaction.4) Within populations there is no detectable variation in clutch size that can be attributed to differences in habitat quality.5) About 40% of the total phenotypic variation in clutch size is genetic variation.Several ways of eliminating a possible resemblance through correlated environments yield the same result.6) Selection for clutch size is demonstrated in several years.7) The implications for rapid evolutionary change in mean clutch size are discussed.
OpenAlex reports 121 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
An analysis is made of genetic and non-genetic components in the number of eggs in the completed first clutch of the Great Tit.1) It is doubtful whether a causal relation between density and clutch size exists.2) There is hardly a systematic effect of age on clutch size.3) There is an annual variation in clutch size with similar changes in individual females in the same population, but it is hardly correlated between populations.This emphasizes a lack of genotype-environment interaction.4) Within populations there is no detectable variation in clutch size that can be attributed to differences in habitat quality.5) About 40% of the total phenotypic variation in clutch size is genetic variation.Several ways of eliminating a possible resemblance through correlated environments yield the same result.6) Selection for clutch size is demonstrated in several years.7) The implications for rapid evolutionary change in mean clutch size are discussed.
Key concepts: Avian clutch size, Clutch, Biology, Parus, Genetic variation, Variation (astronomy), Selection (genetic algorithm), Population