1993•Plastic & Reconstructive SurgeryRequires access

The Dorsal Skin-Flap Model in the Rat

Dennis Clyde Hammond, Ronald D. Brooksher, Robert J. Mann, John H. Beernink

Open publisher page 57 citations

Abstract

Several authors have postulated that the standard McFarlane-type dorsal rat flap model can survive as a graft. Therefore, in an effort to better understand the metabolic support governing the survival of this flap, five flap designs on the dorsal surface of the rat were studied. Each was manipulated to control progressively for the metabolic support to the flap by means of skin-graft and/or skin-flap physiology. The flap designs included (1) a standard McFarlane flap (n = 10), (2) a full-thickness "flap" graft (n = 10), (3) a McFarlane flap separated from the bed with plastic sheeting (n = 9), (4) a McFarlane flap separated from the bed by closing the wound beneath the flap (n = 29), and (5) flaps raised as in group 4 after a 2-week delay procedure (n = 9). Based on direct comparisons of both the pattern of necrosis and the surviving surface area in each group, we conclude that (1) the distal aspect of the dorsal rat flap can survive as a graft when in contact with the underlying bed, (2) the "take" of the flap as a graft is variable, and (3) to serve as a reasonable indicator of human flap behavior, the skin-graft effect must be controlled for by separating the flap from the underlying bed.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Several authors have postulated that the standard McFarlane-type dorsal rat flap model can survive as a graft. Therefore, in an effort to better understand the metabolic support governing the survival of this flap, five flap designs on the dorsal surface of the rat were studied. Each was manipulated to control progressively for the metabolic support to the flap by means of skin-graft and/or skin-flap physiology. The flap designs included (1) a standard McFarlane flap (n = 10), (2) a full-thickness "flap" graft (n = 10), (3) a McFarlane flap separated from the bed with plastic sheeting (n = 9), (4) a McFarlane flap separated from the bed by closing the wound beneath the flap (n = 29), and (5) flaps raised as in group 4 after a 2-week delay procedure (n = 9). Based on direct comparisons of both the pattern of necrosis and the surviving surface area in each group, we conclude that (1) the distal aspect of the dorsal rat flap can survive as a graft when in contact with the underlying bed, (2) the "take" of the flap as a graft is variable, and (3) to serve as a reasonable indicator of human flap behavior, the skin-graft effect must be controlled for by separating the flap from the underlying bed.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 57 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Several authors have postulated that the standard McFarlane-type dorsal rat flap model can survive as a graft. Therefore, in an effort to better understand the metabolic support governing the survival of this flap, five flap designs on the dorsal surface of the rat were studied. Each was manipulated to control progressively for the metabolic support to the flap by means of skin-graft and/or skin-flap physiology. The flap designs included (1) a standard McFarlane flap (n = 10), (2) a full-thickness "flap" graft (n = 10), (3) a McFarlane flap separated from the bed with plastic sheeting (n = 9), (4) a McFarlane flap separated from the bed by closing the wound beneath the flap (n = 29), and (5) flaps raised as in group 4 after a 2-week delay procedure (n = 9). Based on direct comparisons of both the pattern of necrosis and the surviving surface area in each group, we conclude that (1) the distal aspect of the dorsal rat flap can survive as a graft when in contact with the underlying bed, (2) the "take" of the flap as a graft is variable, and (3) to serve as a reasonable indicator of human flap behavior, the skin-graft effect must be controlled for by separating the flap from the underlying bed.

Key concepts: Skin flap, Dorsum, Medicine, Surgery, Anatomy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Dorsal Skin-Flap Model in the Rat — Research Paper | ScholarLens