1996Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/HemostasisRequires access

Effect of Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin (Tinzaparin) and Unfractionated Heparin on Platelet Aggregation

Hanne Berg Ravn, Claus Bregengaard, Henrik Vissinger, Per Østergaard, Jan Holst, Hans K. Nielsen, Steen Dalby Kristensen, Steen Husted

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

A low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), when anti-IIa activity was compared. In the ex vivo part Tinzaparin, was compared with unfractionated heparin of the study, a significant enhancement of ADP-induced (UFH) for their effects on platelet aggregation in vitro and platelet aggregation was observed after i.v. administra ex vivo. Both heparins showed a dose-dependent proag- tion of both Tinzaparin and UFH with no difference in gregatory effect on ADP- and collagen-induced platelet potency. Subcutaneous administration of Tinzaparin in aggregation in vitro, but LMWH was less potent. The two different doses did not have any effect on platelet differences in potency between Tinzaparin and UFH de- activity. In conclusion, Tinzaparin appears, like other pended on how the compounds were compared. The most LMWHs, to have less proaggregatory effect on platelets pronounced difference was found when molar concentra- than UFH both in vitro and ex vivo.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), when anti-IIa activity was compared. In the ex vivo part Tinzaparin, was compared with unfractionated heparin of the study, a significant enhancement of ADP-induced (UFH) for their effects on platelet aggregation in vitro and platelet aggregation was observed after i.v. administra ex vivo. Both heparins showed a dose-dependent proag- tion of both Tinzaparin and UFH with no difference in gregatory effect on ADP- and collagen-induced platelet potency. Subcutaneous administration of Tinzaparin in aggregation in vitro, but LMWH was less potent. The two different doses did not have any effect on platelet differences in potency between Tinzaparin and UFH de- activity. In conclusion, Tinzaparin appears, like other pended on how the compounds were compared. The most LMWHs, to have less proaggregatory effect on platelets pronounced difference was found when molar concentra- than UFH both in vitro and ex vivo.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), when anti-IIa activity was compared. In the ex vivo part Tinzaparin, was compared with unfractionated heparin of the study, a significant enhancement of ADP-induced (UFH) for their effects on platelet aggregation in vitro and platelet aggregation was observed after i.v. administra ex vivo. Both heparins showed a dose-dependent proag- tion of both Tinzaparin and UFH with no difference in gregatory effect on ADP- and collagen-induced platelet potency. Subcutaneous administration of Tinzaparin in aggregation in vitro, but LMWH was less potent. The two different doses did not have any effect on platelet differences in potency between Tinzaparin and UFH de- activity. In conclusion, Tinzaparin appears, like other pended on how the compounds were compared. The most LMWHs, to have less proaggregatory effect on platelets pronounced difference was found when molar concentra- than UFH both in vitro and ex vivo.

Key concepts: Heparin, Ex vivo, Potency, Low molecular weight heparin, Pharmacology, Platelet, In vivo, In vitro

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Effect of Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin (Tinzaparin) and Unfractionated Heparin on Platelet Aggregation — Research Paper | ScholarLens