1979•Journal of the Geological Society of AustraliaRequires access

Caesium as a possible discriminant between felsic rocks of different origins from eastern Australia

Brian L. Gulson, William C. Godbeer

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

The use of Cs to discriminate between igneous rocks derived from an igneous’ protolith (I‐type) and those derived from a metasedimentary protolith (5‐type) is evaluated for selected eastern Australian granitic and felsic volcanic rocks. For this investigation a ‘flame emission’ technique has been developed and tested for the rapid determination of Cs in rock samples. In the Berridale Batholith, where the I‐type, 5‐type subdivision was first recognized, the Cs content of the granites clearly distinguished the two granite types. In the New England Batholith the leucocratic 5‐types have higher Cs abundances, in most cases, than the similar I‐type granites, but the Cs values of the more mafic 5‐type granites overlap those of the I‐type. Problems in assigning origins for volcanics are complicated by alteration, but Cs may be useful in distinguishing reworked tuffs from volcanic rocks in volcanic sequences. Caesium may also find application in distinguishing volcanics and sediments in Precambrian terrains.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The use of Cs to discriminate between igneous rocks derived from an igneous’ protolith (I‐type) and those derived from a metasedimentary protolith (5‐type) is evaluated for selected eastern Australian granitic and felsic volcanic rocks. For this investigation a ‘flame emission’ technique has been developed and tested for the rapid determination of Cs in rock samples. In the Berridale Batholith, where the I‐type, 5‐type subdivision was first recognized, the Cs content of the granites clearly distinguished the two granite types. In the New England Batholith the leucocratic 5‐types have higher Cs abundances, in most cases, than the similar I‐type granites, but the Cs values of the more mafic 5‐type granites overlap those of the I‐type. Problems in assigning origins for volcanics are complicated by alteration, but Cs may be useful in distinguishing reworked tuffs from volcanic rocks in volcanic sequences. Caesium may also find application in distinguishing volcanics and sediments in Precambrian terrains.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The use of Cs to discriminate between igneous rocks derived from an igneous’ protolith (I‐type) and those derived from a metasedimentary protolith (5‐type) is evaluated for selected eastern Australian granitic and felsic volcanic rocks. For this investigation a ‘flame emission’ technique has been developed and tested for the rapid determination of Cs in rock samples. In the Berridale Batholith, where the I‐type, 5‐type subdivision was first recognized, the Cs content of the granites clearly distinguished the two granite types. In the New England Batholith the leucocratic 5‐types have higher Cs abundances, in most cases, than the similar I‐type granites, but the Cs values of the more mafic 5‐type granites overlap those of the I‐type. Problems in assigning origins for volcanics are complicated by alteration, but Cs may be useful in distinguishing reworked tuffs from volcanic rocks in volcanic sequences. Caesium may also find application in distinguishing volcanics and sediments in Precambrian terrains.

Key concepts: Felsic, Protolith, Volcanic rock, Igneous rock, Mafic, Geochemistry, Batholith, Geology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Caesium as a possible discriminant between felsic rocks of different origins from eastern Australia — Research Paper | ScholarLens