2007Journal of Nuclear CardiologyRequires access

Adenosine versus regadenoson comparative evaluation in myocardial perfusion imaging: Results of the ADVANCE phase 3 multicenter international trial

Ami E. Iskandrian, Timothy M. Bateman, Luiz Belardinelli, Brent Blackburn, Manuel D. Cerqueira, Robert C. Hendel, Hsiao D. Lieu, John J. Mahmarian, Ann Olmsted, S. Richard Underwood, João V. Vítola, Whedy Wang

Open publisher page 348 citations

Abstract

This record does not include an abstract. Use the full-text link above if available.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

An abstract is not available in the OpenAlex record for this paper.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 348 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Key concepts: Regadenoson, Medicine, Myocardial perfusion imaging, Adenosine, Confidence interval, Anesthesia, Clinical endpoint, Cardiology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Adenosine versus regadenoson comparative evaluation in myocardial perfusion imaging: Results of the ADVANCE phase 3 multicenter international trial — Research Paper | ScholarLens