1965•Annals of Applied BiologyRequires access

A comparison of some quantitative methods of extracting small vermiform nematodes from soil

A. G. Whitehead, J. R. HEMMING

Open publisher page 1,406 citations

Abstract

SUMMARY When 200 ml. dispersed soil is sedimented from an obliquely rising water current in a simple compartmented tank about three‐quarters of the nematodes are extracted. About 95% of the nematodes in the concentrated suspension can be separated finally from mineral and heavy organic particles by centrifugal notation. When mobile nematodes were finally separated from soil particles by paper tissue, this sedimentation method extracted as many nematodes from sand and loam as Seinhorst's two‐flask and elutriation methods, but in one test extracted fewer Tylenchorhynchus from clay and in another fewer Paratylenchus from clay than the elutriation method. The method is quicker (4 or 6 instead of 30–45 min.) and easier. Mobile nematodes can be extracted from 300 ml. soil spread out on paper tissue in 23. 33 cm. trays of 8 mesh/cm. phosphor‐bronze gauze, just resting on shallow water. The suspension obtained after 24 hr. at 16–18°C. was concentrated to 10–15 ml. without loss by sedimentation in two tapered cylinders, one of 8 cm. bore, the other of 2.6 cm. bore. This method usually extracted significantly more nematodes than the sedimentation, two‐flask and elutriation methods.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

SUMMARY When 200 ml. dispersed soil is sedimented from an obliquely rising water current in a simple compartmented tank about three‐quarters of the nematodes are extracted. About 95% of the nematodes in the concentrated suspension can be separated finally from mineral and heavy organic particles by centrifugal notation. When mobile nematodes were finally separated from soil particles by paper tissue, this sedimentation method extracted as many nematodes from sand and loam as Seinhorst's two‐flask and elutriation methods, but in one test extracted fewer Tylenchorhynchus from clay and in another fewer Paratylenchus from clay than the elutriation method. The method is quicker (4 or 6 instead of 30–45 min.) and easier. Mobile nematodes can be extracted from 300 ml. soil spread out on paper tissue in 23. 33 cm. trays of 8 mesh/cm. phosphor‐bronze gauze, just resting on shallow water. The suspension obtained after 24 hr. at 16–18°C. was concentrated to 10–15 ml. without loss by sedimentation in two tapered cylinders, one of 8 cm. bore, the other of 2.6 cm. bore. This method usually extracted significantly more nematodes than the sedimentation, two‐flask and elutriation methods.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1406 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

SUMMARY When 200 ml. dispersed soil is sedimented from an obliquely rising water current in a simple compartmented tank about three‐quarters of the nematodes are extracted. About 95% of the nematodes in the concentrated suspension can be separated finally from mineral and heavy organic particles by centrifugal notation. When mobile nematodes were finally separated from soil particles by paper tissue, this sedimentation method extracted as many nematodes from sand and loam as Seinhorst's two‐flask and elutriation methods, but in one test extracted fewer Tylenchorhynchus from clay and in another fewer Paratylenchus from clay than the elutriation method. The method is quicker (4 or 6 instead of 30–45 min.) and easier. Mobile nematodes can be extracted from 300 ml. soil spread out on paper tissue in 23. 33 cm. trays of 8 mesh/cm. phosphor‐bronze gauze, just resting on shallow water. The suspension obtained after 24 hr. at 16–18°C. was concentrated to 10–15 ml. without loss by sedimentation in two tapered cylinders, one of 8 cm. bore, the other of 2.6 cm. bore. This method usually extracted significantly more nematodes than the sedimentation, two‐flask and elutriation methods.

Key concepts: Elutriation, Loam, Biology, Sedimentation, Sediment, Soil water, Chromatography, Ecology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A comparison of some quantitative methods of extracting small vermiform nematodes from soil — Research Paper | ScholarLens