1999Muscle & NerveRequires access

New near-nerve needle nerve conduction technique: Differentiating epicondylar from cubital tunnel ulnar neuropathy

Zeki Odabaşı, Shin J. Oh, Gwen C. Claussen, Dae S. Kim

Open publisher page 20 citations

Abstract

At the elbow, the ulnar nerve is compressed most commonly either in the epicondylar groove or at the cubital tunnel. While conventional electrodiagnosis may localize an ulnar neuropathy to the elbow, separating epicondylar syndrome (tardy ulnar nerve palsy) from cubital tunnel syndrome is more difficult. We describe a new method using a near-nerve needle technique for distinguishing these two types of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. We placed three active needle electrodes across the elbow: the first was 4 cm above, and the second and third were 1.5 cm and 6 cm below the medial epicondyle, respectively. The latter two points were chosen because of the presence of the cubital tunnel in this segment. Sensory, motor, and mixed nerve conduction studies (NCS) were performed on these two segments (elbow segment and cubital tunnel segment) in 26 normal nerves and normal data were established. We also present 7 cases of epicondylar ulnar nerve palsy and 1 case of cubital tunnel syndrome in which we were able to confirm the diagnosis with the present method. In 3 cases of epicondylar ulnar nerve palsy, the present method accurately localized the lesion when other methods failed. We believe that this method will be helpful in distinguishing cubital tunnel syndrome from epicondylar ulnar nerve palsy, especially in early ulnar neuropathy in which only sensory fibers are involved.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

At the elbow, the ulnar nerve is compressed most commonly either in the epicondylar groove or at the cubital tunnel. While conventional electrodiagnosis may localize an ulnar neuropathy to the elbow, separating epicondylar syndrome (tardy ulnar nerve palsy) from cubital tunnel syndrome is more difficult. We describe a new method using a near-nerve needle technique for distinguishing these two types of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. We placed three active needle electrodes across the elbow: the first was 4 cm above, and the second and third were 1.5 cm and 6 cm below the medial epicondyle, respectively. The latter two points were chosen because of the presence of the cubital tunnel in this segment. Sensory, motor, and mixed nerve conduction studies (NCS) were performed on these two segments (elbow segment and cubital tunnel segment) in 26 normal nerves and normal data were established. We also present 7 cases of epicondylar ulnar nerve palsy and 1 case of cubital tunnel syndrome in which we were able to confirm the diagnosis with the present method. In 3 cases of epicondylar ulnar nerve palsy, the present method accurately localized the lesion when other methods failed. We believe that this method will be helpful in distinguishing cubital tunnel syndrome from epicondylar ulnar nerve palsy, especially in early ulnar neuropathy in which only sensory fibers are involved.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 20 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

At the elbow, the ulnar nerve is compressed most commonly either in the epicondylar groove or at the cubital tunnel. While conventional electrodiagnosis may localize an ulnar neuropathy to the elbow, separating epicondylar syndrome (tardy ulnar nerve palsy) from cubital tunnel syndrome is more difficult. We describe a new method using a near-nerve needle technique for distinguishing these two types of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. We placed three active needle electrodes across the elbow: the first was 4 cm above, and the second and third were 1.5 cm and 6 cm below the medial epicondyle, respectively. The latter two points were chosen because of the presence of the cubital tunnel in this segment. Sensory, motor, and mixed nerve conduction studies (NCS) were performed on these two segments (elbow segment and cubital tunnel segment) in 26 normal nerves and normal data were established. We also present 7 cases of epicondylar ulnar nerve palsy and 1 case of cubital tunnel syndrome in which we were able to confirm the diagnosis with the present method. In 3 cases of epicondylar ulnar nerve palsy, the present method accurately localized the lesion when other methods failed. We believe that this method will be helpful in distinguishing cubital tunnel syndrome from epicondylar ulnar nerve palsy, especially in early ulnar neuropathy in which only sensory fibers are involved.

Key concepts: Cubital tunnel, Ulnar nerve, Ulnar neuropathy, Elbow, Medicine, Anatomy, Cubital tunnel syndrome, Epicondyle

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
New near-nerve needle nerve conduction technique: Differentiating epicondylar from cubital tunnel ulnar neuropathy — Research Paper | ScholarLens