1995Journal of Interventional CardiologyRequires access

Elastic Recoil and Intimal Thickening After Coronary Stenting

Yasunori Ueda, Shinsuke Nanto, Kazuo Komamura, Kazuhisa Kodama

Open publisher page 8 citations

Abstract

In this study, the long-term elastic recoil of the stents and the intimal thickening over the stents were evaluated separately. Twenty-nine patients who received a Wiktor coronary stent were angiographically followed-up at 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months. The elastic recoil of the stent was evaluated by the changes in minimum stent diameter. The intimal thickness was evaluated by the difference between minimum stent diameter and minimum lumen diameter. Minimum stent diameter showed no significant change up to 6 months. The significant increase (P < 0.05) of the intimal thickness was detected only between 2 weeks and 3 months. In conclusion, the Wiktor stent prevented the elastic recoil up to 6 months, and was covered by the neointima which increased its thickness mainly between 2 weeks and 3 months after stenting. It was suggested that stent restenosis was not caused by the elastic recoil, but by the intimal thickening.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In this study, the long-term elastic recoil of the stents and the intimal thickening over the stents were evaluated separately. Twenty-nine patients who received a Wiktor coronary stent were angiographically followed-up at 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months. The elastic recoil of the stent was evaluated by the changes in minimum stent diameter. The intimal thickness was evaluated by the difference between minimum stent diameter and minimum lumen diameter. Minimum stent diameter showed no significant change up to 6 months. The significant increase (P < 0.05) of the intimal thickness was detected only between 2 weeks and 3 months. In conclusion, the Wiktor stent prevented the elastic recoil up to 6 months, and was covered by the neointima which increased its thickness mainly between 2 weeks and 3 months after stenting. It was suggested that stent restenosis was not caused by the elastic recoil, but by the intimal thickening.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In this study, the long-term elastic recoil of the stents and the intimal thickening over the stents were evaluated separately. Twenty-nine patients who received a Wiktor coronary stent were angiographically followed-up at 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months. The elastic recoil of the stent was evaluated by the changes in minimum stent diameter. The intimal thickness was evaluated by the difference between minimum stent diameter and minimum lumen diameter. Minimum stent diameter showed no significant change up to 6 months. The significant increase (P < 0.05) of the intimal thickness was detected only between 2 weeks and 3 months. In conclusion, the Wiktor stent prevented the elastic recoil up to 6 months, and was covered by the neointima which increased its thickness mainly between 2 weeks and 3 months after stenting. It was suggested that stent restenosis was not caused by the elastic recoil, but by the intimal thickening.

Key concepts: Elastic recoil, Medicine, Stent, Thickening, Neointima, Restenosis, Lumen (anatomy), Recoil

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Elastic Recoil and Intimal Thickening After Coronary Stenting — Research Paper | ScholarLens