2008•IEEE MicroRequires access

An Update on "Exhaustion"—Supreme Court Decides Quanta Case

Richard H. Stern

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

In the November/December 2007 issue of IEEE Micro, this column reported that the Supreme Court had decided to hear an appeal of the Federal Circuit's decision in a patent licensing case for the first time in many years. The Court has now decided the case and reversed the judgment of the Federal Circuit, but it did so in a decision based on narrow grounds and leaving many mportant questions unanswered - in fact, unaddressed. As explained in the earlier Micro Law column, the case nvolves the "exhaustion doctrine," under which the sale of a patented product by the patentee or its licensee "exhausts" patent rights in regard to the sold product. The question in the case was whether the sale of microprocessors and chipsets to Quanta by Intel - a licensee of the patent holder, LG Electronics (LGE) - exhausted LGE's patent rights in regard to those microprocessors and chipsets.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In the November/December 2007 issue of IEEE Micro, this column reported that the Supreme Court had decided to hear an appeal of the Federal Circuit's decision in a patent licensing case for the first time in many years. The Court has now decided the case and reversed the judgment of the Federal Circuit, but it did so in a decision based on narrow grounds and leaving many mportant questions unanswered - in fact, unaddressed. As explained in the earlier Micro Law column, the case nvolves the "exhaustion doctrine," under which the sale of a patented product by the patentee or its licensee "exhausts" patent rights in regard to the sold product. The question in the case was whether the sale of microprocessors and chipsets to Quanta by Intel - a licensee of the patent holder, LG Electronics (LGE) - exhausted LGE's patent rights in regard to those microprocessors and chipsets.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In the November/December 2007 issue of IEEE Micro, this column reported that the Supreme Court had decided to hear an appeal of the Federal Circuit's decision in a patent licensing case for the first time in many years. The Court has now decided the case and reversed the judgment of the Federal Circuit, but it did so in a decision based on narrow grounds and leaving many mportant questions unanswered - in fact, unaddressed. As explained in the earlier Micro Law column, the case nvolves the "exhaustion doctrine," under which the sale of a patented product by the patentee or its licensee "exhausts" patent rights in regard to the sold product. The question in the case was whether the sale of microprocessors and chipsets to Quanta by Intel - a licensee of the patent holder, LG Electronics (LGE) - exhausted LGE's patent rights in regard to those microprocessors and chipsets.

Key concepts: Licensee, Supreme court, Appeal, Hearsay, Law, Doctrine, Chipset, Product (mathematics)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
An Update on "Exhaustion"—Supreme Court Decides Quanta Case — Research Paper | ScholarLens