2004Optometry and Vision ScienceRequires access

Clinical Evaluation of the Topcon BV‐1000 Automated Subjective Refraction System

Trusit Dave, Y. Fukuma

Open publisher page 26 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The BV-1000 is a new instrument that performs binocular autorefraction and subjective refraction. The aim of the study was to evaluate the accuracy of the BV-1000 compared with subjective refraction without cycloplegia and the repeatability of the BV-1000 in subjects without cycloplegia. METHODS: BV-1000 binocular autorefraction (mean of three measures) and automated subjective refraction was performed on 100 eyes and compared with practitioner subjective refraction. After BV-1000 assessment, the result was modified by the investigator in the form of a binocular addition; the practitioner was masked as to the result of the BV-1000. Repeatability was evaluated by comparing the test-retest data on 40 eyes. Refraction data were converted into Fourier component terms: mean spherical equivalent (MSE), J0, J45, and vector dioptric difference (VDD). RESULTS: Mean difference of MSE (BV-1000 subjective vs. practitioner) was 0.05 +/- 0.35 D (p = 0.13), whereas after binocular addition, the mean difference in MSE was -0.01 +/- 0.21 D (p = 0.67). The mean difference of MSE (BV-1000 objective vs. practitioner) was +0.10 +/- 0.37 D (p < 0.05). Mean difference in J0 and J45 was -0.03 +/- 0.12 D (p = 0.09) and -0.02 +/- 0.10 D (p = 0.06), respectively. More than 95% of cylinder powers were within +/- 0.50 D. The median VDD was 0.35 D (range, 1.38 D; interquartile range, 0.31) for comparisons of BV-1000 subjective refraction and the practitioner. A median VDD of 0.25 D (range, 1.06 D; interquartile range, 0.16) was found after binocular addition correction. There was no statistically significant difference (p = 0.73) in spherical intereye difference between BV-1000 subjective and subjective refraction. Mean spherical intereye difference (spherical balancing error) between the BV-1000 and practitioner subjective refraction was -0.02 +/- 0.24 D. Repeatability as described by the mean difference between occasions for MSE was found to be -0.06 +/- 0.19 D, -0.02 +/- 0.08 D for J0, and -0.03 +/- 0.07 D for J45. CONCLUSIONS: The subjective refraction routine within the BV-1000 improves the results of simultaneous binocular autorefraction data. The BV-1000 provides an accurate and repeatable measure of subjective refraction after binocular addition.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: The BV-1000 is a new instrument that performs binocular autorefraction and subjective refraction. The aim of the study was to evaluate the accuracy of the BV-1000 compared with subjective refraction without cycloplegia and the repeatability of the BV-1000 in subjects without cycloplegia. METHODS: BV-1000 binocular autorefraction (mean of three measures) and automated subjective refraction was performed on 100 eyes and compared with practitioner subjective refraction. After BV-1000 assessment, the result was modified by the investigator in the form of a binocular addition; the practitioner was masked as to the result of the BV-1000. Repeatability was evaluated by comparing the test-retest data on 40 eyes. Refraction data were converted into Fourier component terms: mean spherical equivalent (MSE), J0, J45, and vector dioptric difference (VDD). RESULTS: Mean difference of MSE (BV-1000 subjective vs. practitioner) was 0.05 +/- 0.35 D (p = 0.13), whereas after binocular addition, the mean difference in MSE was -0.01 +/- 0.21 D (p = 0.67). The mean difference of MSE (BV-1000 objective vs. practitioner) was +0.10 +/- 0.37 D (p < 0.05). Mean difference in J0 and J45 was -0.03 +/- 0.12 D (p = 0.09) and -0.02 +/- 0.10 D (p = 0.06), respectively. More than 95% of cylinder powers were within +/- 0.50 D. The median VDD was 0.35 D (range, 1.38 D; interquartile range, 0.31) for comparisons of BV-1000 subjective refraction and the practitioner. A median VDD of 0.25 D (range, 1.06 D; interquartile range, 0.16) was found after binocular addition correction. There was no statistically significant difference (p = 0.73) in spherical intereye difference between BV-1000 subjective and subjective refraction. Mean spherical intereye difference (spherical balancing error) between the BV-1000 and practitioner subjective refraction was -0.02 +/- 0.24 D. Repeatability as described by the mean difference between occasions for MSE was found to be -0.06 +/- 0.19 D, -0.02 +/- 0.08 D for J0, and -0.03 +/- 0.07 D for J45. CONCLUSIONS: The subjective refraction routine within the BV-1000 improves the results of simultaneous binocular autorefraction data. The BV-1000 provides an accurate and repeatable measure of subjective refraction after binocular addition.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 26 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: The BV-1000 is a new instrument that performs binocular autorefraction and subjective refraction. The aim of the study was to evaluate the accuracy of the BV-1000 compared with subjective refraction without cycloplegia and the repeatability of the BV-1000 in subjects without cycloplegia. METHODS: BV-1000 binocular autorefraction (mean of three measures) and automated subjective refraction was performed on 100 eyes and compared with practitioner subjective refraction. After BV-1000 assessment, the result was modified by the investigator in the form of a binocular addition; the practitioner was masked as to the result of the BV-1000. Repeatability was evaluated by comparing the test-retest data on 40 eyes. Refraction data were converted into Fourier component terms: mean spherical equivalent (MSE), J0, J45, and vector dioptric difference (VDD). RESULTS: Mean difference of MSE (BV-1000 subjective vs. practitioner) was 0.05 +/- 0.35 D (p = 0.13), whereas after binocular addition, the mean difference in MSE was -0.01 +/- 0.21 D (p = 0.67). The mean difference of MSE (BV-1000 objective vs. practitioner) was +0.10 +/- 0.37 D (p < 0.05). Mean difference in J0 and J45 was -0.03 +/- 0.12 D (p = 0.09) and -0.02 +/- 0.10 D (p = 0.06), respectively. More than 95% of cylinder powers were within +/- 0.50 D. The median VDD was 0.35 D (range, 1.38 D; interquartile range, 0.31) for comparisons of BV-1000 subjective refraction and the practitioner. A median VDD of 0.25 D (range, 1.06 D; interquartile range, 0.16) was found after binocular addition correction. There was no statistically significant difference (p = 0.73) in spherical intereye difference between BV-1000 subjective and subjective refraction. Mean spherical intereye difference (spherical balancing error) between the BV-1000 and practitioner subjective refraction was -0.02 +/- 0.24 D. Repeatability as described by the mean difference between occasions for MSE was found to be -0.06 +/- 0.19 D, -0.02 +/- 0.08 D for J0, and -0.03 +/- 0.07 D for J45. CONCLUSIONS: The subjective refraction routine within the BV-1000 improves the results of simultaneous binocular autorefraction data. The BV-1000 provides an accurate and repeatable measure of subjective refraction after binocular addition.

Key concepts: Cycloplegia, Subjective refraction, Mean difference, Repeatability, Refraction, Mathematics, Optometry, Significant difference

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Clinical Evaluation of the Topcon BV‐1000 Automated Subjective Refraction System — Research Paper | ScholarLens