1995TectonicsRequires access

Seismotectonics of the April 25, 1992, Petrolia earthquake and the Mendocino triple junction region

Yuichiro Tanioka, Kenji Satake, Larry J. Ruff

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

The April 25, 1992, Petrolia earthquake (M s 7.1) occurred at the southern tip of the Cascadia subduction zone. This is the largest thrust earthquake ever recorded instrumentally in the Cascadia subduction zone. The earthquake was followed by two large strike‐slip aftershocks (both Ms 6.6). Moment release of each of the earthquakes is as follows: 4.0 × 1019 Nm in the first 10 s for the mainshock, 0.7 × 1019 Nm in the first 8 s for the first aftershock, and 0.9 × 1019 Nm in the first 2 s for the second aftershock. These indicate that the mainshock and each of the aftershocks may have different tectonic backgrounds. The best depth estimates of the mainshock and the two aftershocks are 14 km, 18 km, and 24 km, respectively. The slip direction of the mainshock is between N75°E and N80°E. This slip direction is not consistent with either the relative motion of the North American and Juan de Fuca plates (N60°E) or between the North American plate and the Gorda deformation zone (N40°E). It has been suggested that the North American‐Pacific plate motion is accommodated by right‐lateral slip on both the San Andreas and Maacama‐Rodgers Creek‐Hayward fault systems; the intervening block is the Humboldt plate. If we modify the relative motion of the southernmost Gorda deformation zone to conform with the seismicity trends and allow the Humboldt‐Pacific plate motion to be about half the total North American‐Pacific motion, then the Gorda deformation zone‐Humboldt relative motion matches the direction of the Petrolia slip vector. Also, the mixture of focal mechanisms in the two distinct aftershock clusters can be explained by motion between the Gorda deformation zone and Pacific plate and the Humboldt and North American plates. The Gorda deformation zone is subducting beneath the Humboldt plate in the Cape Mendocino area, and the Petrolia earthquake ruptured the entire subduction segment between the Gorda deformation zone and Humboldt plate.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The April 25, 1992, Petrolia earthquake (M s 7.1) occurred at the southern tip of the Cascadia subduction zone. This is the largest thrust earthquake ever recorded instrumentally in the Cascadia subduction zone. The earthquake was followed by two large strike‐slip aftershocks (both Ms 6.6). Moment release of each of the earthquakes is as follows: 4.0 × 1019 Nm in the first 10 s for the mainshock, 0.7 × 1019 Nm in the first 8 s for the first aftershock, and 0.9 × 1019 Nm in the first 2 s for the second aftershock. These indicate that the mainshock and each of the aftershocks may have different tectonic backgrounds. The best depth estimates of the mainshock and the two aftershocks are 14 km, 18 km, and 24 km, respectively. The slip direction of the mainshock is between N75°E and N80°E. This slip direction is not consistent with either the relative motion of the North American and Juan de Fuca plates (N60°E) or between the North American plate and the Gorda deformation zone (N40°E). It has been suggested that the North American‐Pacific plate motion is accommodated by right‐lateral slip on both the San Andreas and Maacama‐Rodgers Creek‐Hayward fault systems; the intervening block is the Humboldt plate. If we modify the relative motion of the southernmost Gorda deformation zone to conform with the seismicity trends and allow the Humboldt‐Pacific plate motion to be about half the total North American‐Pacific motion, then the Gorda deformation zone‐Humboldt relative motion matches the direction of the Petrolia slip vector. Also, the mixture of focal mechanisms in the two distinct aftershock clusters can be explained by motion between the Gorda deformation zone and Pacific plate and the Humboldt and North American plates. The Gorda deformation zone is subducting beneath the Humboldt plate in the Cape Mendocino area, and the Petrolia earthquake ruptured the entire subduction segment between the Gorda deformation zone and Humboldt plate.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The April 25, 1992, Petrolia earthquake (M s 7.1) occurred at the southern tip of the Cascadia subduction zone. This is the largest thrust earthquake ever recorded instrumentally in the Cascadia subduction zone. The earthquake was followed by two large strike‐slip aftershocks (both Ms 6.6). Moment release of each of the earthquakes is as follows: 4.0 × 1019 Nm in the first 10 s for the mainshock, 0.7 × 1019 Nm in the first 8 s for the first aftershock, and 0.9 × 1019 Nm in the first 2 s for the second aftershock. These indicate that the mainshock and each of the aftershocks may have different tectonic backgrounds. The best depth estimates of the mainshock and the two aftershocks are 14 km, 18 km, and 24 km, respectively. The slip direction of the mainshock is between N75°E and N80°E. This slip direction is not consistent with either the relative motion of the North American and Juan de Fuca plates (N60°E) or between the North American plate and the Gorda deformation zone (N40°E). It has been suggested that the North American‐Pacific plate motion is accommodated by right‐lateral slip on both the San Andreas and Maacama‐Rodgers Creek‐Hayward fault systems; the intervening block is the Humboldt plate. If we modify the relative motion of the southernmost Gorda deformation zone to conform with the seismicity trends and allow the Humboldt‐Pacific plate motion to be about half the total North American‐Pacific motion, then the Gorda deformation zone‐Humboldt relative motion matches the direction of the Petrolia slip vector. Also, the mixture of focal mechanisms in the two distinct aftershock clusters can be explained by motion between the Gorda deformation zone and Pacific plate and the Humboldt and North American plates. The Gorda deformation zone is subducting beneath the Humboldt plate in the Cape Mendocino area, and the Petrolia earthquake ruptured the entire subduction segment between the Gorda deformation zone and Humboldt plate.

Key concepts: Geology, Seismology, Aftershock, North American Plate, Subduction, Pacific Plate, Seismotectonics, Triple junction

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Seismotectonics of the April 25, 1992, Petrolia earthquake and the Mendocino triple junction region — Research Paper | ScholarLens