INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND SOCIAL EVALUATION: A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
Prasanta K. Pattanaik, Kotaro Suzumura
Abstract
Prasanta K. Pattanaik, Kotaro Suzumura
Abstract
We propose a framework for the analysis of social choice and welfare which uses the informational basis of individual preference orderings over the pairs of conventionally defined social alternatives and social decision-making mechanisms. In particular, we consider the case where the decision-making mechanism is a rights-structure modelled as game forms. We use this framework to clarify the role for individual preferences in conferring rights, in the realization of the conferred rights, and in describing the formal contents of rights. We also explore its implications for the controversial issue of the consistency of social choice and Sen's paradox of Paretian libertarianism.
OpenAlex reports 60 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
We propose a framework for the analysis of social choice and welfare which uses the informational basis of individual preference orderings over the pairs of conventionally defined social alternatives and social decision-making mechanisms. In particular, we consider the case where the decision-making mechanism is a rights-structure modelled as game forms. We use this framework to clarify the role for individual preferences in conferring rights, in the realization of the conferred rights, and in describing the formal contents of rights. We also explore its implications for the controversial issue of the consistency of social choice and Sen's paradox of Paretian libertarianism.
Key concepts: Conceptual framework, Library science, Sociology, Political science, Regional science, Public administration, Social science, Computer science