2009Indoor and Built EnvironmentRequires access

Width Distributions of Asbestos and Non-Asbestos Amphibole Minerals

D.R. Van Orden, R.J. Lee, K.A. Allison, J. Addison

Open publisher page 14 citations

Abstract

Amphibole asbestos fibers and non-asbestos amphibole particles have been shown to have different size characteristics, in addition to their morphological differences. There is a tendency, however, among laboratories and some regulators to ignore the morphological differences and to simply rely on a minimal aspect ratio to determine whether a particle is an asbestos fiber. This study, part of a larger evaluation of amphibole minerals, was undertaken to provide supporting size data that can be used to identify populations of asbestos and non-asbestos amphibole minerals. The asbestos samples average 0.27 μm in width with 90% thinner than 0.5 μm. In contrast, the non-asbestos amphiboles average 0.97 μm wide with 75% wider than 0.53 μm. The average aspect ratios were 76 : 1 for asbestos and 16 : 1 for the non-asbestos samples. These data confirm the historical distinctions of asbestos and non-asbestos amphibole minerals.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Amphibole asbestos fibers and non-asbestos amphibole particles have been shown to have different size characteristics, in addition to their morphological differences. There is a tendency, however, among laboratories and some regulators to ignore the morphological differences and to simply rely on a minimal aspect ratio to determine whether a particle is an asbestos fiber. This study, part of a larger evaluation of amphibole minerals, was undertaken to provide supporting size data that can be used to identify populations of asbestos and non-asbestos amphibole minerals. The asbestos samples average 0.27 μm in width with 90% thinner than 0.5 μm. In contrast, the non-asbestos amphiboles average 0.97 μm wide with 75% wider than 0.53 μm. The average aspect ratios were 76 : 1 for asbestos and 16 : 1 for the non-asbestos samples. These data confirm the historical distinctions of asbestos and non-asbestos amphibole minerals.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 14 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Amphibole asbestos fibers and non-asbestos amphibole particles have been shown to have different size characteristics, in addition to their morphological differences. There is a tendency, however, among laboratories and some regulators to ignore the morphological differences and to simply rely on a minimal aspect ratio to determine whether a particle is an asbestos fiber. This study, part of a larger evaluation of amphibole minerals, was undertaken to provide supporting size data that can be used to identify populations of asbestos and non-asbestos amphibole minerals. The asbestos samples average 0.27 μm in width with 90% thinner than 0.5 μm. In contrast, the non-asbestos amphiboles average 0.97 μm wide with 75% wider than 0.53 μm. The average aspect ratios were 76 : 1 for asbestos and 16 : 1 for the non-asbestos samples. These data confirm the historical distinctions of asbestos and non-asbestos amphibole minerals.

Key concepts: Amphibole, Asbestos, Mineralogy, Asbestos fibers, Chrysotile, Mineral, Geology, Geochemistry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Width Distributions of Asbestos and Non-Asbestos Amphibole Minerals — Research Paper | ScholarLens