Width Distributions of Asbestos and Non-Asbestos Amphibole Minerals
D.R. Van Orden, R.J. Lee, K.A. Allison, J. Addison
Abstract
D.R. Van Orden, R.J. Lee, K.A. Allison, J. Addison
Abstract
Amphibole asbestos fibers and non-asbestos amphibole particles have been shown to have different size characteristics, in addition to their morphological differences. There is a tendency, however, among laboratories and some regulators to ignore the morphological differences and to simply rely on a minimal aspect ratio to determine whether a particle is an asbestos fiber. This study, part of a larger evaluation of amphibole minerals, was undertaken to provide supporting size data that can be used to identify populations of asbestos and non-asbestos amphibole minerals. The asbestos samples average 0.27 μm in width with 90% thinner than 0.5 μm. In contrast, the non-asbestos amphiboles average 0.97 μm wide with 75% wider than 0.53 μm. The average aspect ratios were 76 : 1 for asbestos and 16 : 1 for the non-asbestos samples. These data confirm the historical distinctions of asbestos and non-asbestos amphibole minerals.
OpenAlex reports 14 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Amphibole asbestos fibers and non-asbestos amphibole particles have been shown to have different size characteristics, in addition to their morphological differences. There is a tendency, however, among laboratories and some regulators to ignore the morphological differences and to simply rely on a minimal aspect ratio to determine whether a particle is an asbestos fiber. This study, part of a larger evaluation of amphibole minerals, was undertaken to provide supporting size data that can be used to identify populations of asbestos and non-asbestos amphibole minerals. The asbestos samples average 0.27 μm in width with 90% thinner than 0.5 μm. In contrast, the non-asbestos amphiboles average 0.97 μm wide with 75% wider than 0.53 μm. The average aspect ratios were 76 : 1 for asbestos and 16 : 1 for the non-asbestos samples. These data confirm the historical distinctions of asbestos and non-asbestos amphibole minerals.
Key concepts: Amphibole, Asbestos, Mineralogy, Asbestos fibers, Chrysotile, Mineral, Geology, Geochemistry