2012Collnet Journal of Scientometrics and Information ManagementRequires access

An Investigation of Citations Pattern to Iranian’s English Journals Using Google Scholar & ISI: Do They Differ?

Zohreh Zahedi, Mansoureh Serati Shirazi

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

This study examines the differences between Web of Science and Google Scholar in the citation counting, citation ranking of 7 Iranian’s English Journals indexed in JCR, and investigates whether there is any relationship between their impact factors, number of articles and the rate of citations they get. Furthermore, their visibility in international level is determined. According to the findings, there is not any significant difference between the citations rate in GS and ISI. Among these journals JISC received the most citations in ISI WOS and IJER received the most citations in GS. In both GS and WOS databases, the majority of citations to the articles came from Asia, Europe, and America respectively and the minimum rate of citations related to Africa and Australia in GS and WOS orderly. In country level, in both databases the most rate of citations were journal self citations and related to Iran, in GS it followed by US and UK but in WOS it followed by India and china. In GS there is a negative relationship between the number of Citations and the number of articles. Unlike in Google Scholar database, the correlation between citations and journal impact factor is significant in ISI database. It means that the more the impact factor a journal had the more citations it received in ISI database; but this fact is not true in GS database.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This study examines the differences between Web of Science and Google Scholar in the citation counting, citation ranking of 7 Iranian’s English Journals indexed in JCR, and investigates whether there is any relationship between their impact factors, number of articles and the rate of citations they get. Furthermore, their visibility in international level is determined. According to the findings, there is not any significant difference between the citations rate in GS and ISI. Among these journals JISC received the most citations in ISI WOS and IJER received the most citations in GS. In both GS and WOS databases, the majority of citations to the articles came from Asia, Europe, and America respectively and the minimum rate of citations related to Africa and Australia in GS and WOS orderly. In country level, in both databases the most rate of citations were journal self citations and related to Iran, in GS it followed by US and UK but in WOS it followed by India and china. In GS there is a negative relationship between the number of Citations and the number of articles. Unlike in Google Scholar database, the correlation between citations and journal impact factor is significant in ISI database. It means that the more the impact factor a journal had the more citations it received in ISI database; but this fact is not true in GS database.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This study examines the differences between Web of Science and Google Scholar in the citation counting, citation ranking of 7 Iranian’s English Journals indexed in JCR, and investigates whether there is any relationship between their impact factors, number of articles and the rate of citations they get. Furthermore, their visibility in international level is determined. According to the findings, there is not any significant difference between the citations rate in GS and ISI. Among these journals JISC received the most citations in ISI WOS and IJER received the most citations in GS. In both GS and WOS databases, the majority of citations to the articles came from Asia, Europe, and America respectively and the minimum rate of citations related to Africa and Australia in GS and WOS orderly. In country level, in both databases the most rate of citations were journal self citations and related to Iran, in GS it followed by US and UK but in WOS it followed by India and china. In GS there is a negative relationship between the number of Citations and the number of articles. Unlike in Google Scholar database, the correlation between citations and journal impact factor is significant in ISI database. It means that the more the impact factor a journal had the more citations it received in ISI database; but this fact is not true in GS database.

Key concepts: Computer science, Information retrieval, World Wide Web, Data science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
An Investigation of Citations Pattern to Iranian’s English Journals Using Google Scholar & ISI: Do They Differ? — Research Paper | ScholarLens