1980Archives of Internal MedicineRequires access

Status Report on Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis in End-Stage Renal Disease

Edward J. Weinman

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Several new trends in the treatment of patients with end-stage renal disease have begun to emerge in the last few years. Most notable has been the reintroduction of peritoneal dialysis (PD) as a long-term treatment option. The increased use of PD is the result of the development of a long-term indwelling peritoneal catheter, automated dialysate delivery systems, and the view by some investigators that, in certain patients, PD as compared with hemodialysis may be a preferred mode of therapy. In 1978, continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) was introduced and demonstrated to be an alternative to traditional intermittent peritoneal dialysis (IPD).1With CAPD, the patient instills the dialysis solution for four to six hours and exchanges the solution four to five times per day, six or seven days per week. Thus, while the efficiency of dialysis per hour is less with CAPD than with IPD, the clearances per week of

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Several new trends in the treatment of patients with end-stage renal disease have begun to emerge in the last few years. Most notable has been the reintroduction of peritoneal dialysis (PD) as a long-term treatment option. The increased use of PD is the result of the development of a long-term indwelling peritoneal catheter, automated dialysate delivery systems, and the view by some investigators that, in certain patients, PD as compared with hemodialysis may be a preferred mode of therapy. In 1978, continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) was introduced and demonstrated to be an alternative to traditional intermittent peritoneal dialysis (IPD).1With CAPD, the patient instills the dialysis solution for four to six hours and exchanges the solution four to five times per day, six or seven days per week. Thus, while the efficiency of dialysis per hour is less with CAPD than with IPD, the clearances per week of

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Several new trends in the treatment of patients with end-stage renal disease have begun to emerge in the last few years. Most notable has been the reintroduction of peritoneal dialysis (PD) as a long-term treatment option. The increased use of PD is the result of the development of a long-term indwelling peritoneal catheter, automated dialysate delivery systems, and the view by some investigators that, in certain patients, PD as compared with hemodialysis may be a preferred mode of therapy. In 1978, continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) was introduced and demonstrated to be an alternative to traditional intermittent peritoneal dialysis (IPD).1With CAPD, the patient instills the dialysis solution for four to six hours and exchanges the solution four to five times per day, six or seven days per week. Thus, while the efficiency of dialysis per hour is less with CAPD than with IPD, the clearances per week of

Key concepts: Medicine, Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis, Peritoneal dialysis, End stage renal disease, Hemodialysis, Dialysis, Ambulatory, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Status Report on Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis in End-Stage Renal Disease — Research Paper | ScholarLens