1992BijdragenRequires access

EVOLUTION, TELEOLOGY AND THEOLOGY

F.J.K.J. Soontiëns

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

In this article it is argued that there is a fundamental misunderstanding about the concept of teleology in western thinking. This is a result of a radical transformation of the Aristotelian concept of teleology by Christian theology during the Middle Ages. Teleology was, and is, implicitly identified with the argument from design. This misconception resulted in a confusion about the role of teleology and chance in evolution. I shall give a rough sketch of the history of teleological thinking and an argumentation for the view that the rejection of a role for teleology in evolution cannot be justified. To accept a natural teleology would be more in accordance with the position of man as a product of a natural evolutionary process, and it would serve as a prerequisite for the formulation of an adequate bio- and eco-ethics.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In this article it is argued that there is a fundamental misunderstanding about the concept of teleology in western thinking. This is a result of a radical transformation of the Aristotelian concept of teleology by Christian theology during the Middle Ages. Teleology was, and is, implicitly identified with the argument from design. This misconception resulted in a confusion about the role of teleology and chance in evolution. I shall give a rough sketch of the history of teleological thinking and an argumentation for the view that the rejection of a role for teleology in evolution cannot be justified. To accept a natural teleology would be more in accordance with the position of man as a product of a natural evolutionary process, and it would serve as a prerequisite for the formulation of an adequate bio- and eco-ethics.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In this article it is argued that there is a fundamental misunderstanding about the concept of teleology in western thinking. This is a result of a radical transformation of the Aristotelian concept of teleology by Christian theology during the Middle Ages. Teleology was, and is, implicitly identified with the argument from design. This misconception resulted in a confusion about the role of teleology and chance in evolution. I shall give a rough sketch of the history of teleological thinking and an argumentation for the view that the rejection of a role for teleology in evolution cannot be justified. To accept a natural teleology would be more in accordance with the position of man as a product of a natural evolutionary process, and it would serve as a prerequisite for the formulation of an adequate bio- and eco-ethics.

Key concepts: Teleology, Teleological argument, Epistemology, Philosophy, Argument (complex analysis), Argumentation theory, Sketch, Confusion

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
EVOLUTION, TELEOLOGY AND THEOLOGY — Research Paper | ScholarLens