1996ELT JournalRequires access

Intonation rules in ELT textbooks

Richard Cauldwell, Martin Hewings

Open publisher page 33 citations

Abstract

In this paper we examine in detail the two rules of intonation perhaps most commonly found in ELT textbooks, those concerning intonation in lists and intonation in questions. We begin by arguing that the rules given are inadequate as descriptions of what occurs in naturally-occurring speech. We then go on to offer alternative analyses of the various patterns of intonation found in lists and in questions, using the discourse intonation model (Brazil 1985, 1994). In conclusion we suggest that, as teachers and materials writers, we need to provide learners with descriptions of intonation which will allow them to understand the communicative significance of the patterns of intonation identified in such rules, and of the exceptions to those rules.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In this paper we examine in detail the two rules of intonation perhaps most commonly found in ELT textbooks, those concerning intonation in lists and intonation in questions. We begin by arguing that the rules given are inadequate as descriptions of what occurs in naturally-occurring speech. We then go on to offer alternative analyses of the various patterns of intonation found in lists and in questions, using the discourse intonation model (Brazil 1985, 1994). In conclusion we suggest that, as teachers and materials writers, we need to provide learners with descriptions of intonation which will allow them to understand the communicative significance of the patterns of intonation identified in such rules, and of the exceptions to those rules.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 33 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In this paper we examine in detail the two rules of intonation perhaps most commonly found in ELT textbooks, those concerning intonation in lists and intonation in questions. We begin by arguing that the rules given are inadequate as descriptions of what occurs in naturally-occurring speech. We then go on to offer alternative analyses of the various patterns of intonation found in lists and in questions, using the discourse intonation model (Brazil 1985, 1994). In conclusion we suggest that, as teachers and materials writers, we need to provide learners with descriptions of intonation which will allow them to understand the communicative significance of the patterns of intonation identified in such rules, and of the exceptions to those rules.

Key concepts: Intonation (linguistics), Linguistics, Psychology, Philosophy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Intonation rules in ELT textbooks — Research Paper | ScholarLens