2007Current SociologyRequires access

Agency Relationships, Embeddedness and Employment Relations

Leszek Chajewski

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

Economic sociology, for all its successes, is yet to develop an explanation of recent growth in market-driven policies such as flexibility in the use of labour and precarious employment. Embeddedness-centred perspectives in economic sociology are unlikely to correct this omission because their objective is to show that market-driven practices are not what they seem, i.e. that under a closer examination they also prove the embeddedness thesis. However, if the current labour market practices and those of two decades ago both represent embedded economic relations, then the concept of embeddedness sheds little light on key social and economic processes of our times. This article, inspired by the role that organized labour played in recent market transitions in Eastern Europe, demonstrates that a theory of agency relationship is a necessary addition to the embeddedness thesis, if economic sociology is to account for labour's present tendency to eschew social protection.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Economic sociology, for all its successes, is yet to develop an explanation of recent growth in market-driven policies such as flexibility in the use of labour and precarious employment. Embeddedness-centred perspectives in economic sociology are unlikely to correct this omission because their objective is to show that market-driven practices are not what they seem, i.e. that under a closer examination they also prove the embeddedness thesis. However, if the current labour market practices and those of two decades ago both represent embedded economic relations, then the concept of embeddedness sheds little light on key social and economic processes of our times. This article, inspired by the role that organized labour played in recent market transitions in Eastern Europe, demonstrates that a theory of agency relationship is a necessary addition to the embeddedness thesis, if economic sociology is to account for labour's present tendency to eschew social protection.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Economic sociology, for all its successes, is yet to develop an explanation of recent growth in market-driven policies such as flexibility in the use of labour and precarious employment. Embeddedness-centred perspectives in economic sociology are unlikely to correct this omission because their objective is to show that market-driven practices are not what they seem, i.e. that under a closer examination they also prove the embeddedness thesis. However, if the current labour market practices and those of two decades ago both represent embedded economic relations, then the concept of embeddedness sheds little light on key social and economic processes of our times. This article, inspired by the role that organized labour played in recent market transitions in Eastern Europe, demonstrates that a theory of agency relationship is a necessary addition to the embeddedness thesis, if economic sociology is to account for labour's present tendency to eschew social protection.

Key concepts: Embeddedness, Economic sociology, Agency (philosophy), Sociology, Flexibility (engineering), Structure and agency, Positive economics, Economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Agency Relationships, Embeddedness and Employment Relations — Research Paper | ScholarLens