1990•Journal of Antimicrobial ChemotherapyRequires access

Bioavailability of cefuroxime axetil: comparison of standard and abbreviated methods

Chim Choy Lang, Terence A. Moreland, Peter G Davey

Open publisher page 21 citations

Abstract

A randomized cross-over study comparing serum and urinary concentrations of cefuroxime after a 750 mg intravenous dose of cefuroxime and a 500 mg oral dose of cefuroxime axetil was conducted to evaluate the bioavailability of the current marketed formulation of cefuroxime axetil. The absolute bioavailability was compared with various abbreviated methods of assessing bioavailability. The peak concentrations (Cmax) and times to peak (Tmax) varied considerably (range 4.7-12.0 mg/l and 1.5-4 h respectively). The absolute bioavailability was 67.9%. The urine recovery after oral dosage and urine bioavailability were 38.6% and 50.3% respectively. The mean AUC0-6 h after the oral dosage was 27.7 mg/l.h. Both urine recovery and urine bioavailability were poor indicators of bioavailability (r = 0.54, r = 0.33 respectively). Although AUC0-6 h after the oral dose was positively correlated with absolute bioavailability, the coefficient of determination (r2) indicated that only 56% of the variation in absolute bioavailability was explained by AUC0-6 h. This study demonstrated that the current formulation of cefuroxime axetil is reliably absorbed although there is considerable variation in Cmax and Tmax. Because of this variation and because the abbreviated methods were unsatisfactory, we recommend that bioavailability of cefuroxime axetil in patients should be measured by formal intravenous/oral cross-over serum concentration studies.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A randomized cross-over study comparing serum and urinary concentrations of cefuroxime after a 750 mg intravenous dose of cefuroxime and a 500 mg oral dose of cefuroxime axetil was conducted to evaluate the bioavailability of the current marketed formulation of cefuroxime axetil. The absolute bioavailability was compared with various abbreviated methods of assessing bioavailability. The peak concentrations (Cmax) and times to peak (Tmax) varied considerably (range 4.7-12.0 mg/l and 1.5-4 h respectively). The absolute bioavailability was 67.9%. The urine recovery after oral dosage and urine bioavailability were 38.6% and 50.3% respectively. The mean AUC0-6 h after the oral dosage was 27.7 mg/l.h. Both urine recovery and urine bioavailability were poor indicators of bioavailability (r = 0.54, r = 0.33 respectively). Although AUC0-6 h after the oral dose was positively correlated with absolute bioavailability, the coefficient of determination (r2) indicated that only 56% of the variation in absolute bioavailability was explained by AUC0-6 h. This study demonstrated that the current formulation of cefuroxime axetil is reliably absorbed although there is considerable variation in Cmax and Tmax. Because of this variation and because the abbreviated methods were unsatisfactory, we recommend that bioavailability of cefuroxime axetil in patients should be measured by formal intravenous/oral cross-over serum concentration studies.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 21 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A randomized cross-over study comparing serum and urinary concentrations of cefuroxime after a 750 mg intravenous dose of cefuroxime and a 500 mg oral dose of cefuroxime axetil was conducted to evaluate the bioavailability of the current marketed formulation of cefuroxime axetil. The absolute bioavailability was compared with various abbreviated methods of assessing bioavailability. The peak concentrations (Cmax) and times to peak (Tmax) varied considerably (range 4.7-12.0 mg/l and 1.5-4 h respectively). The absolute bioavailability was 67.9%. The urine recovery after oral dosage and urine bioavailability were 38.6% and 50.3% respectively. The mean AUC0-6 h after the oral dosage was 27.7 mg/l.h. Both urine recovery and urine bioavailability were poor indicators of bioavailability (r = 0.54, r = 0.33 respectively). Although AUC0-6 h after the oral dose was positively correlated with absolute bioavailability, the coefficient of determination (r2) indicated that only 56% of the variation in absolute bioavailability was explained by AUC0-6 h. This study demonstrated that the current formulation of cefuroxime axetil is reliably absorbed although there is considerable variation in Cmax and Tmax. Because of this variation and because the abbreviated methods were unsatisfactory, we recommend that bioavailability of cefuroxime axetil in patients should be measured by formal intravenous/oral cross-over serum concentration studies.

Key concepts: Bioavailability, Cefuroxime, Cmax, Urine, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacology, Oral administration, Medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Bioavailability of cefuroxime axetil: comparison of standard and abbreviated methods — Research Paper | ScholarLens