1998Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and GynaecologyRequires access

Do Multiple Measurements Employing Different Ultrasonic Techniques Improve the Accuracy of Amniotic Fluid Volume Assessment?

Everett F. Magann, Suneet P. Chauhan, Neil S. Whitworth, Jack H. Klausen, Andrew K. Saltzman, John C. Morrison

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

This investigation was undertaken to determine if the accuracy of the ultrasound assessment of abnormal amniotic fluid volume (oligohydramnios or polyhydramnios) is improved by employing multiple sonographic amniotic fluid measurements. Four ultrasound techniques consisting of the subjective assessment (ultrasonic visualization without measurement), largest vertical pocket, amniotic fluid index and 2-diameter pocket technique were performed followed by amniocentesis and dye-dilution confirmation of amniotic fluid volume in 66 singleton pregnancies. The ultrasound accuracy to detect abnormal amniotic fluid volume ranged from 61% with the largest vertical pocket to 70% with the 2-diameter pocket procedure used separately. Receiver operator characteristic curves demonstrated that combining the 4 ultrasonic measurements did not improve the accuracy of identifying amniotic fluid volumes.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This investigation was undertaken to determine if the accuracy of the ultrasound assessment of abnormal amniotic fluid volume (oligohydramnios or polyhydramnios) is improved by employing multiple sonographic amniotic fluid measurements. Four ultrasound techniques consisting of the subjective assessment (ultrasonic visualization without measurement), largest vertical pocket, amniotic fluid index and 2-diameter pocket technique were performed followed by amniocentesis and dye-dilution confirmation of amniotic fluid volume in 66 singleton pregnancies. The ultrasound accuracy to detect abnormal amniotic fluid volume ranged from 61% with the largest vertical pocket to 70% with the 2-diameter pocket procedure used separately. Receiver operator characteristic curves demonstrated that combining the 4 ultrasonic measurements did not improve the accuracy of identifying amniotic fluid volumes.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This investigation was undertaken to determine if the accuracy of the ultrasound assessment of abnormal amniotic fluid volume (oligohydramnios or polyhydramnios) is improved by employing multiple sonographic amniotic fluid measurements. Four ultrasound techniques consisting of the subjective assessment (ultrasonic visualization without measurement), largest vertical pocket, amniotic fluid index and 2-diameter pocket technique were performed followed by amniocentesis and dye-dilution confirmation of amniotic fluid volume in 66 singleton pregnancies. The ultrasound accuracy to detect abnormal amniotic fluid volume ranged from 61% with the largest vertical pocket to 70% with the 2-diameter pocket procedure used separately. Receiver operator characteristic curves demonstrated that combining the 4 ultrasonic measurements did not improve the accuracy of identifying amniotic fluid volumes.

Key concepts: Amniotic fluid, Oligohydramnios, Amniocentesis, Ultrasound, Ultrasonic sensor, Amniotic fluid index, Volume (thermodynamics), Biomedical engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Do Multiple Measurements Employing Different Ultrasonic Techniques Improve the Accuracy of Amniotic Fluid Volume Assessment? — Research Paper | ScholarLens