Conditioning-specific reflex modification of the rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) nictitating membrane response: Generality and nature of the phenomenon.
Deanna L. Buck, Matthew A. Seager, Bernard G. Schreurs
Abstract
Deanna L. Buck, Matthew A. Seager, Bernard G. Schreurs
Abstract
Conditioning-specific reflex modification (CRM) occurs when classical conditioning modifies responding to an unconditioned stimulus in the absence of a conditioned stimulus. This form of reflex modification suggests that learning modifies the unconditioned reflex pathway. Rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) nictitating membrane responses to 5 intensities and 3 durations of airpuff (AP) or periorbital electrical stimulation (ES) were monitored before and after conditioning. AP tests detected strong CRM after conditioning with ES and modest levels of CRM after conditioning with AP. After conditioning with AP, ES tests failed to detect CRM. After conditioning with a stronger AP, CRM was again detected by AP tests. CRM is a general phenomenon but is more readily detected after training with a relatively aversive stimulus; thus, it may be a function of level of arousal.
OpenAlex reports 31 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Conditioning-specific reflex modification (CRM) occurs when classical conditioning modifies responding to an unconditioned stimulus in the absence of a conditioned stimulus. This form of reflex modification suggests that learning modifies the unconditioned reflex pathway. Rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) nictitating membrane responses to 5 intensities and 3 durations of airpuff (AP) or periorbital electrical stimulation (ES) were monitored before and after conditioning. AP tests detected strong CRM after conditioning with ES and modest levels of CRM after conditioning with AP. After conditioning with AP, ES tests failed to detect CRM. After conditioning with a stronger AP, CRM was again detected by AP tests. CRM is a general phenomenon but is more readily detected after training with a relatively aversive stimulus; thus, it may be a function of level of arousal.
Key concepts: Nictitating membrane, Conditioning, Classical conditioning, Reflex, Unconditioned stimulus, Stimulus (psychology), Stimulation, Neuroscience