2000Australian ForestryRequires access

ThinningPinus radiataplantation by operator selection: 1. Effects on the residual forest

B. J. Yeo, Michael Stewart

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

Summary Field trials were undertaken in Pinus radiata plantation, in order to compare thinning where the harvesting machine operator selects the trees to be thinned without prior tree marking, with conventional tree-marked thinning, in terms of stand and tree parameters such as residual stocking and spacing, basal area, mean tree diameter, and frequency of damaged trees. These trials included first and second thinning on high and low site quality and two trials at operational scale. On the whole, operators thinned to the same stand density and tree diameter distribution as tree-marked thinning in comparable stands. The removal of undesirable trees was generally as good as in tree-marked thinning. In two trials operator selected thinning resulted in a better quality residual stand than tree-marked thinning. Trials at the operational level also indicate practicalities of two types of guidelines for operator selection thinning: a diameter limit; and spacing of residual trees.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Summary Field trials were undertaken in Pinus radiata plantation, in order to compare thinning where the harvesting machine operator selects the trees to be thinned without prior tree marking, with conventional tree-marked thinning, in terms of stand and tree parameters such as residual stocking and spacing, basal area, mean tree diameter, and frequency of damaged trees. These trials included first and second thinning on high and low site quality and two trials at operational scale. On the whole, operators thinned to the same stand density and tree diameter distribution as tree-marked thinning in comparable stands. The removal of undesirable trees was generally as good as in tree-marked thinning. In two trials operator selected thinning resulted in a better quality residual stand than tree-marked thinning. Trials at the operational level also indicate practicalities of two types of guidelines for operator selection thinning: a diameter limit; and spacing of residual trees.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Summary Field trials were undertaken in Pinus radiata plantation, in order to compare thinning where the harvesting machine operator selects the trees to be thinned without prior tree marking, with conventional tree-marked thinning, in terms of stand and tree parameters such as residual stocking and spacing, basal area, mean tree diameter, and frequency of damaged trees. These trials included first and second thinning on high and low site quality and two trials at operational scale. On the whole, operators thinned to the same stand density and tree diameter distribution as tree-marked thinning in comparable stands. The removal of undesirable trees was generally as good as in tree-marked thinning. In two trials operator selected thinning resulted in a better quality residual stand than tree-marked thinning. Trials at the operational level also indicate practicalities of two types of guidelines for operator selection thinning: a diameter limit; and spacing of residual trees.

Key concepts: Thinning, Pinus radiata, Basal area, Stocking, Radiata, Tree (set theory), Residual, Mathematics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
ThinningPinus radiataplantation by operator selection: 1. Effects on the residual forest — Research Paper | ScholarLens