1990Journal of Clinical PsychopharmacologyRequires access

Tourette Syndrome

Paul Sandor, SEGANE MUSISI, Harvey Moldofsky, Anthony E. Lang

Open publisher page 45 citations

Abstract

We describe a long-term follow-up study (1-15 years) of 33 patients with Tourette syndrome who were treated with pimozide (2-18 mg), haloperidol (2-15 mg), or no drugs. Both drugs produced comparable relief of symptoms at follow up; however, significantly more patients on haloperidol (eight of 17), compared with those on pimozide (one of 13), discontinued treatment (p less than or equal to 0.05). Haloperidol produced significantly more acute dyskinesias/dystonias than pimozide (p less than or equal to 0.03); otherwise, the adverse effect profile was similar for the two drugs. In particular, we found no increased incidence of ECG abnormalities in patients treated with pimozide. A prospective, randomized, double-blind crossover trial is required to determine whether there are significant differences in efficacy between pimozide and haloperidol in treatment of Tourette's disorder.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

We describe a long-term follow-up study (1-15 years) of 33 patients with Tourette syndrome who were treated with pimozide (2-18 mg), haloperidol (2-15 mg), or no drugs. Both drugs produced comparable relief of symptoms at follow up; however, significantly more patients on haloperidol (eight of 17), compared with those on pimozide (one of 13), discontinued treatment (p less than or equal to 0.05). Haloperidol produced significantly more acute dyskinesias/dystonias than pimozide (p less than or equal to 0.03); otherwise, the adverse effect profile was similar for the two drugs. In particular, we found no increased incidence of ECG abnormalities in patients treated with pimozide. A prospective, randomized, double-blind crossover trial is required to determine whether there are significant differences in efficacy between pimozide and haloperidol in treatment of Tourette's disorder.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 45 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

We describe a long-term follow-up study (1-15 years) of 33 patients with Tourette syndrome who were treated with pimozide (2-18 mg), haloperidol (2-15 mg), or no drugs. Both drugs produced comparable relief of symptoms at follow up; however, significantly more patients on haloperidol (eight of 17), compared with those on pimozide (one of 13), discontinued treatment (p less than or equal to 0.05). Haloperidol produced significantly more acute dyskinesias/dystonias than pimozide (p less than or equal to 0.03); otherwise, the adverse effect profile was similar for the two drugs. In particular, we found no increased incidence of ECG abnormalities in patients treated with pimozide. A prospective, randomized, double-blind crossover trial is required to determine whether there are significant differences in efficacy between pimozide and haloperidol in treatment of Tourette's disorder.

Key concepts: Pimozide, Haloperidol, Medicine, Tourette syndrome, Adverse effect, Anesthesia, Tics, Crossover study

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Tourette Syndrome — Research Paper | ScholarLens