2000New Zealand Journal of Geology and GeophysicsOpen access

Foreshock probabilities in New Zealand

M. K. Savage, S. Rupp

Open full text 26 citations

Abstract

Abstract An event that is not already part of an aftershock sequence is considered a foreshock if it is followed by an equal or larger earthquake within 5 days and 30 km. The likelihood that an apparently isolated event (shallower than 40 km and greater than magnitude 5.0) in New Zealand is a foreshock averages 4.5 ± 0.7%. If the mainshock is required to have a magnitude at least one unit greater than the foreshock, the probability drops to 0.8 ± 0.3%. Little difference in foreshock probability is noticeable between two different aftershock‐removal windows, between different magnitude ranges, or between different time periods. However, events deeper than 40 km yield probabilities that depend on magnitude and also on aftershock‐removal parameters, suggesting that clustering of deep earthquakes occurs via a different process from that in shallow earthquakes. For shallow earthquakes, the results are consistent with a model in which foreshocks are manifestations of the same process as aftershocks.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract An event that is not already part of an aftershock sequence is considered a foreshock if it is followed by an equal or larger earthquake within 5 days and 30 km. The likelihood that an apparently isolated event (shallower than 40 km and greater than magnitude 5.0) in New Zealand is a foreshock averages 4.5 ± 0.7%. If the mainshock is required to have a magnitude at least one unit greater than the foreshock, the probability drops to 0.8 ± 0.3%. Little difference in foreshock probability is noticeable between two different aftershock‐removal windows, between different magnitude ranges, or between different time periods. However, events deeper than 40 km yield probabilities that depend on magnitude and also on aftershock‐removal parameters, suggesting that clustering of deep earthquakes occurs via a different process from that in shallow earthquakes. For shallow earthquakes, the results are consistent with a model in which foreshocks are manifestations of the same process as aftershocks.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 26 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract An event that is not already part of an aftershock sequence is considered a foreshock if it is followed by an equal or larger earthquake within 5 days and 30 km. The likelihood that an apparently isolated event (shallower than 40 km and greater than magnitude 5.0) in New Zealand is a foreshock averages 4.5 ± 0.7%. If the mainshock is required to have a magnitude at least one unit greater than the foreshock, the probability drops to 0.8 ± 0.3%. Little difference in foreshock probability is noticeable between two different aftershock‐removal windows, between different magnitude ranges, or between different time periods. However, events deeper than 40 km yield probabilities that depend on magnitude and also on aftershock‐removal parameters, suggesting that clustering of deep earthquakes occurs via a different process from that in shallow earthquakes. For shallow earthquakes, the results are consistent with a model in which foreshocks are manifestations of the same process as aftershocks.

Key concepts: Foreshock, Aftershock, Seismology, Magnitude (astronomy), Geology, Physics, Astronomy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Foreshock probabilities in New Zealand — Research Paper | ScholarLens