Revisiting the Concepts: Time to Challenge the Asset‐Liability View
Steinar Sars Kvifte
Abstract
Steinar Sars Kvifte
Abstract
The IASB and the FASB are in a joint project to update, complete and converge their conceptual frameworks. The two standard‐setters have not identified the merits of the asset‐liability view as a cross‐cutting issue. This paper suggests that the relationship between the objective of financial reporting and the asset‐liability view is not substantiated, and that there is little evidence that the frameworks and the asset and liability definitions have been useful in establishing objective recognition criteria. Hence, there are reasons for the FASB and the IASB to challenge the asset‐liability view.
OpenAlex reports 14 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The IASB and the FASB are in a joint project to update, complete and converge their conceptual frameworks. The two standard‐setters have not identified the merits of the asset‐liability view as a cross‐cutting issue. This paper suggests that the relationship between the objective of financial reporting and the asset‐liability view is not substantiated, and that there is little evidence that the frameworks and the asset and liability definitions have been useful in establishing objective recognition criteria. Hence, there are reasons for the FASB and the IASB to challenge the asset‐liability view.
Key concepts: Liability, Asset (computer security), Business, Accounting, Conceptual framework, Actuarial science, Computer science, Sociology