2008Australian Accounting ReviewRequires access

Revisiting the Concepts: Time to Challenge the Asset‐Liability View

Steinar Sars Kvifte

Open publisher page 14 citations

Abstract

The IASB and the FASB are in a joint project to update, complete and converge their conceptual frameworks. The two standard‐setters have not identified the merits of the asset‐liability view as a cross‐cutting issue. This paper suggests that the relationship between the objective of financial reporting and the asset‐liability view is not substantiated, and that there is little evidence that the frameworks and the asset and liability definitions have been useful in establishing objective recognition criteria. Hence, there are reasons for the FASB and the IASB to challenge the asset‐liability view.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The IASB and the FASB are in a joint project to update, complete and converge their conceptual frameworks. The two standard‐setters have not identified the merits of the asset‐liability view as a cross‐cutting issue. This paper suggests that the relationship between the objective of financial reporting and the asset‐liability view is not substantiated, and that there is little evidence that the frameworks and the asset and liability definitions have been useful in establishing objective recognition criteria. Hence, there are reasons for the FASB and the IASB to challenge the asset‐liability view.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 14 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The IASB and the FASB are in a joint project to update, complete and converge their conceptual frameworks. The two standard‐setters have not identified the merits of the asset‐liability view as a cross‐cutting issue. This paper suggests that the relationship between the objective of financial reporting and the asset‐liability view is not substantiated, and that there is little evidence that the frameworks and the asset and liability definitions have been useful in establishing objective recognition criteria. Hence, there are reasons for the FASB and the IASB to challenge the asset‐liability view.

Key concepts: Liability, Asset (computer security), Business, Accounting, Conceptual framework, Actuarial science, Computer science, Sociology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Revisiting the Concepts: Time to Challenge the Asset‐Liability View — Research Paper | ScholarLens